PWE3 Working Group                            Yaakov (Jonathan) Stein
    Internet Draft                                         Ronen Shashoua
    draft-stein-tdm-as-00.txt                                  Ron Insler
    Expires: December 2002                        RAD Data Communications
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                June 2002
 
 
 
                        TDM Applicability Statement
 
                          draft-stein-tdm-as-00.txt
 
 
 Status of this Memo
 
    This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
    all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
 
    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
    Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
    other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
    Drafts.
 
    Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
    months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
    documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
    as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
    progress."
 
    The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
    http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
 
    The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
    http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
 
 
 TDMoIP                                                        [PAGE 1]                    TDM Applicability Statement                June, 2002
 
 
 Abstract
 
    This document is an applicability statement for emulation of time
    division multiplexed (TDM) digital voice and data signals over
    Pseudo Wires.
 
 
 Conventions used in this document
 
    The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
    NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
    in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
 
 Table of Contents
 
    1. Introduction .................................................2
    2. Applicability Statement ......................................2
    3. References ...................................................5
    4. Contact Information ..........................................5
 
 
 
 
 1. Introduction
 
    Telephony traffic is conventionally carried over connection-
    oriented synchronous or plesiosynchronous networks (which will be
    loosely called TDM networks herein). With the proliferation of
    packet-switched networks (PSNs), telephony carriers desire
    integration of TDM services into a unified PSN infrastructure.
    This integration requires emulation of TDM circuits within the
    PSN, a function that can be carried out using Pseudo Wires (PWs),
    as described in the PWE3 requirements [PWE-REQ] and framework
    [PWE-FR] documents. This emulation must ensure QoS and voice
    quality similar to those of existing circuit-based networks as
    well as preserving signaling features.
 
 
 
 2. Applicability Statement
 
    2.1 Reliability
    A method of transporting TDM traffic over PWs must take into
    account a customer's expectations regarding end-to-end behavior of
    TDM services. Customers have become accustomed to "five nine"
    reliability, meaning that the infrastructure functions correctly
    99.999 percent of the time.
 
    Due to the limitations of packet switched networks (PSNs), it will
    not be possible to maintain this level of service reliability in
    PW emulations of TDM services. Instead we suggest requiring "three
    nines" reliability. This means in particular, that no more than
 
 Stein et al.                                                  [PAGE 2]                    TDM Applicability Statement                June, 2002
 
    one in a thousand calls will be disconnected prematurely, no more
    than one in a thousand initiations will be misrouted, etc.
 
    When transporting SS7 signaling, the availability and
    dependability performance objectives of [Q.766] are not expected
    to be met unless further mechanisms are put in place.
 
 
    2.2 TDM traffic types
    A method for transporting TDM traffic over PWs MUST be able to
    handle all of the following types of TDM traffic
    [G.703,G.704,G.751,T1.107]
 
       n*64K
       unstructured T1
       unstructured E1
       structured T1 without CAS
       structured E1 without CAS
       structured T1 with CAS
       structured E1 with CAS
       T3
       E3
 
    The traffic may consist of any combination of multiplexed voice,
    voice-band data, or leased-line services.
 
 
    2.3 Timing transport
    TDM circuits need to maintain jitter and wander to within limits
    specified by the relevant standards [G.823,G.824]. In all cases a
    jitter buffer will be required to be supplied by the edge devices,
    in order to allow compensation for the packet delay variation of
    the underlying PSN.
 
    If a reliable local source of timing is not available, clock
    information MUST be transferred edge to edge. Although some
    degradation in the stratum level is to be expected, the recovered
    clock must conform to the standards.
 
 
    2.4 TDM Alarms
    Standard TDM alarms MUST be both transferred edge to edge and MUST
    be generated when required.
 
 
    2.5 Latency
    Latency and hence round trip delay may increase when transporting
    over a PW. Since round-trip delay may not conform to what is
    termed "acceptable for most user applications" in [G.114],
    mechanisms for reducing latency (such as trading off reduced
    efficiency for reduced latency) SHOULD be provided.
 
 
 
 Stein et al.                                                  [PAGE 3]                    TDM Applicability Statement                June, 2002
 
 
    2.6 Audio Quality
    For voice traffic the voice quality MUST be similar to those of
    existing circuit-based networks, but may suffer minor degradation
    due to increased delay and jitter. [P.800]
 
    Non-voice, in-band signals required for the proper operation of
    the public switched telephone network MUST be transported
    sufficiently accurately as to enable their detection and disallow
    their false-alarms, in order to maintain proper operation
    according to their normative standards. Such signals include dual
    tone multifrequency (DTMF) tones, the 2100 Hz tone including any
    associated phase reversals and amplitude modulations,
    multifrequency tones incorporated in the various signaling systems
    of the PSTN, and tones used in national signaling systems for
    ring-back, busy and congestions indication.
 
    Voice-band modem transmissions MUST be transported sufficiently
    accurately as to enable their essentially unimpaired operation.
 
 
    2.7 Echo cancellation
    Echo cancellation conforming to [G.168] MUST be provided whenever
    the emulated service would have provided it. In addition, due to
    latency often exceeding that of the emulated service, echo
    cancellation MUST be provided whenever the latency exceeds 30
    milliseconds and echo cancellation is not otherwise provided.
 
 
    2.8 CAS signaling
    When present, CAS signaling MUST be transparently transferred edge
    to edge. The precise phase of signaling bits inside multiframes
    need not always be retained.
 
    Since CAS signaling bits can be used to transport hooking, hook-
    flash, and pulse dialing indications, CAS transition timings and
    durations MUST be maintained.
 
    2.9 CCS signaling
    Trunk associated CCS signaling (e.g. [Q.700]) MUST be transferred
    edge to edge. For HDLC type payloads the precise number of idle
    flags may not be preserved, and to conserve bandwidth, unnecessary
    flags SHOULD be removed.
 
    2.10 PSN Bandwidth Conservation
    In order to conserve PSN bandwidth the encapsulation overhead
    SHOULD be kept to a minimum.
 
    Whenever possible, PSN bandwidth conservation techniques such as
    dynamic bandwidth allocation (whereby only active timeslots are
    transported), SHOULD be employed.
 
 
 
 Stein et al.                                                  [PAGE 4]                    TDM Applicability Statement                June, 2002
 
 
 
 3. References
 
    [G.114] ITU-T Recommendation G.114 (05/00)
    One-way transmission time
 
    [G.168] ITU-T Recommendation G.168 (04/00)
    Digital network echo cancellers
 
    [G.703] ITU-T Recommendation G.703 (10/98)
    Physical/electrical characteristics of hierarchical digital
    interfaces
 
    [G.704] ITU-T Recommendation G.704 (10/98)
    Synchronous frame structures used at 1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and
    44736 Kbit/s hierarchical levels
 
    [G.751] ITU-T Recommendation G.751 (11/88)
    Digital multiplex equipments operating at the third order bit rate
    of 34 368 Kbit/s and the fourth order bit rate of 139 264 Kbit/s
    and using positive justification
 
    [G.823] ITU-T Recommendation G.823 (03/00)
    The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are
    based on the 2048 Kbit/s hierarchy
 
    [G.824] ITU-T Recommendation G.824 (03/00)
    The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are
    based on the 1544 Kbit/s hierarchy
 
    [P.800] ITU-T Recommendation P.800 (08/96)
    Methods for Subjective Determnation of Transmission Quality
 
    [Q.700] ITU-T Recommendation Q.700 (03/93)
    Introduction to CCITT Signalling System No. 7
 
    [Q.766] ITU-T Recommendation Q.766 (03/93)
    Performance Objectives in the Integrated Services Digital Network
    Application (SS7 ISUP)
 
    [T1.107] ANS        -                I T1.107 1995 (07/95) Digital Hierarchy - Formats
    Specifications
 
 
 4. Contact Information
 
    Yaakov (Jonathan) Stein
    RAD Data Communications
    24 Raoul Wallenburg St., Bldg C
    Tel-Aviv 69719   ISRAEL
    Phone: +972 3 645-5389
    Email: yaakov_s@rad.co.il
 
 Stein et al.                                                  [PAGE 5]                    TDM Applicability Statement                June, 2002
 
 
    Ronen Shashoua
    RAD Data Communications
    24 Raoul Wallenburg St., Bldg C
    Tel-Aviv 69719  ISRAEL
    Phone: +972 3 645-5447
    Email: ronen_s@rad.co.il
 
    Ron Insler
    RAD Data Communications
    24 Raoul Wallenburg St., Bldg C
    Tel-Aviv 69719  ISRAEL
    Phone: +972 3 645-5445
    Email: ron_i@rad.co.il
 
 
 
 
 Copyright Notice
 
    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
 
    This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished
    to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise
    explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared,
    copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without
    restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice
    and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative
    works.  However, this document itself may not be modified in any
    way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the
    Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed
    for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the
    procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards
    process must be followed, or as required to translate it into
    languages other than English.
 
    The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not
    be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 
    This document and the information contained herein is provided on
    an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
    ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
    IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
    THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
    WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
    PURPOSE."
 
 Stein et al.                                                  [PAGE 6]