Network Working Group S. Vinapamula
Internet-Draft Juniper Networks
Intended status: BCP M. Boucadair
Expires: November 6, 2014 France Telecom
May 5, 2014
Recommendation for Prefix Binding in the Softwire DS-Lite Context
draft-vinapamula-softwire-dslite-prefix-binding-02
Abstract
This document discusses issues induced by the change of the Basic
Bridging BroadBand (B4) IPv6 address and sketches a set of
recommendations to solve those issues.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 6, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Prefix Binding for DS-Lite May 2014
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. The Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.1. Normative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Prefix Binding for DS-Lite May 2014
1. Introduction
IPv6 deployment models assumes IPv6 prefixes are delegated by Service
Providers to the connected CPEs (Customer Premise Equipments) or
hosts, which in their turn derive IPv6 addresses out of that prefix.
In the case of DS-Lite [RFC6333], the Basic Bridging BroadBand (B4)
element derives an IPv6 address for the softwire setup purposes.
A B4 element might obtain a new external IPv6 address, for a variety
of reasons including a reboot of the CPE, power outage, DHCP lease
expiry, or other action undertaken by the Service Provider. If this
occurs, traffic forwarded to a B4's previous address might be
delivered to another B4 that now acquired that address. This affects
all mapping types, whether implicit (e.g., by sending a TCP SYN) or
explicit (e.g., using PCP [RFC6887]).
The main goal of this document is to propose recommendations to
soften the impact of such renumbering issues.
Note that in some deployments, CPE renumbering may be required to
accommodate some privacy-related requirements to avoid the same
prefix be assigned to the same customer. It is out of scope of this
document to discuss such contexts.
This document complements [RFC6908].
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. The Problem
Since the network behind B4 can be overlapping across multiple CPEs,
B4 address plays a key role in identifying associated resources
assigned for each of the connections. These resources maintain state
of Endpoint-Independent Mapping (EIM), Endpoint-Independent Filtering
(EIF), Address Pooling Paired (APP) in the AFTR, and Port Control
Protocol (PCP) mappings and flows.
However, there can be change in B4 address for any reason, may be
because of change in CPE device or may be because of security
extensions enabled in generating the IPv6 address. When the address
change, the associated mappings created in the AFTR are no more
valid. This may result in creation of new set of mappings.
Service Providers may want to limit the usage of these resources on
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Prefix Binding for DS-Lite May 2014
per subscriber basis for fairness resources usage. To that aim , a
subscriber is identified by the delegated IPv6 prefix and not the
derived B4 address. These policies are used for dimensioning
purposes and also to ensure that AFTR resources are not exhausted.
However when there is a change in B4 address, this policy doesn't
resolve stale mappings hanging around in the system, consuming not
only system resources, but also reducing the available quota of
resources per subscriber.
Clearing those mappings can be envisaged, but that will cause a lot
of churn in the AFTR and could be disruptive to existing connections.
When services are hosted behind B4 element, and when there is a
change in B4 address which if results in change in NAT address, these
services have to advertise about their change, whenever there is a
change of the B4 address. Means to discover the change of B4 address
and NAT address is therefore required. Also, it doesn't address
latency issues where a service has to advertise its newly assigned
external IP address and port and the clients have to consume and re-
initiate connections.
PCP-specific failure scenarios are discussed in
[I-D.boucadair-pcp-failure].
4. Recommendations
In order to mitigate the issues discussed in Section 3, the following
recommendations are made:
1. A policy SHOULD be enforced at the AFTR level to limit the number
of active softwires per subscriber. The default value MUST be 1.
This policy aims to prevent a misbehaving subscriber to mount
several softwires to consume more resources on the AFTR side.
2. Resource contexts created at the AFTR level SHOULD be based on
the delegated IPv6 prefix and not based on the B4 address.
Delegated prefix may be derived from the B4 address through a
configured subscriber-mask. Administrators SHOULD configure per
prefix limits of resource usage, instead of per tunnel limits.
These resources include, number of flows, mappings including PCP,
NAT pool resources, etc.
1. Subscriber-mask is an integer that indicates the length of
significant bits to be applied on the source IPv6 address
(internal side) to identify a subscriber. Subscriber-mask is
an AFTR system-wide configuration parameter that is used to
enforce generic per-subscriber policies. Applying these
generic policies does not require to configure every
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Prefix Binding for DS-Lite May 2014
subscriber prefix. Subscriber-mask must be configurable; the
default value is 56.
2. For example, suppose an IPv6 prefix 2001::/56 is delegated to
a CPE. Administrator should configure resource usage limits
in AFTR based on the prefix 2001::/56 and not based on any B4
address derived from the delegated prefix. AFTR will derive
the prefix from B4 address through configured subscriber-mask
set to 56 by the administrator.
3. In the event a new IPv6 address is assigned to B4, the AFTR
SHOULD migrate existing state to be bound to the new B4's IP
address. This ensures the traffic destined to the previous B4
address will be redirected to the newer B4 address. The
destination address for tunneling return traffic SHOULD be the
last seen as B4's address from the CPE. Doing so avoids stale
mappings and minimizes the risk of service disruption.
4. In the event of change of the CPE WAN's IPv6 prefix, unsolicited
PCP ANNOUNCE messages are to be sent by the B4 element to
internal hosts to update their mappings. This allows internal
PCP clients to update their mappings with the new B4 IPv6 address
and trigger updates to rendez-vous servers (e.g., dynamic DNS).
5. When a new prefix is assigned to the CPE, stale mappings may
exist in the AFTR. This will consume both implicit and explicit
resources. In order to avoid such issues, stable IPv6 prefix
assignment is RECOMMENDED.
6. In case for any reason an IPv6 prefix has to be reassigned, it is
RECOMMENDED to reassign an IPv6 prefix only when all the
resources in use associated with that prefix are cleared from the
AFTR. Doing so avoids to redirect traffic, destined to the
previous prefix owner, to the new one.
5. Security Considerations
Security considerations related to DS-Lite are discussed in
[RFC6333].
6. IANA Considerations
This document does not require any action from IANA.
7. Acknowledgements
G. Krishna and C. Jacquenet reviewed document and provided useful
comments.
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Prefix Binding for DS-Lite May 2014
8. References
8.1. Normative references
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs
to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14,
RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC6333] Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and
Y. Lee, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband
Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion",
RFC 6333, August 2011.
[RFC6887] Wing, D., Cheshire, S., Boucadair, M.,
Penno, R., and P. Selkirk, "Port Control
Protocol (PCP)", RFC 6887, April 2013.
8.2. Informative references
[I-D.boucadair-pcp-failure] Boucadair, M. and R. Penno, "Analysis of
Port Control Protocol (PCP) Failure
Scenarios",
draft-boucadair-pcp-failure-06 (work in
progress), May 2013.
[RFC6908] Lee, Y., Maglione, R., Williams, C.,
Jacquenet, C., and M. Boucadair,
"Deployment Considerations for Dual-
Stack Lite", RFC 6908, March 2013.
Authors' Addresses
Suresh Vinapamula
Juniper Networks
1194 North Mathilda Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
USA
Phone: +1 408 936 5441
EMail: sureshk@juniper.net
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Prefix Binding for DS-Lite May 2014
Mohamed Boucadair
France Telecom
Rennes 35000
France
EMail: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Vinapamula & Boucadair Expires November 6, 2014 [Page 7]