| Internet-Draft | det-rdap-diff-access | September 2024 |
| Wiethuechter | Expires 31 March 2025 | [Page] |
- Workgroup:
- drip Working Group
- Internet-Draft:
- draft-wiethuechter-drip-det-diff-access-rdap-00
- Published:
- Intended Status:
- Standards Track
- Expires:
DRIP Entity Tag (DET) Differentiated Access using RDAP
Abstract
This document defines an RDAP profile and extension data model for UAS registration. It also gives recommendations for AAA mechanisms.¶
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 31 March 2025.¶
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
1. Introduction
For DRIP private information is accessed via the lookup of the DRIP Entity Tag (DET) [RFC9374] in DNS [DET-DNS] and following a URI. This URI per [RFC9153] REG-2 MUST have the data behind it access controlled.¶
It should be noted that full compliance with RDAP is not required but RECOMMENDED. Where possible DRIP reuses RDAP query methods and reuses or extends response models.¶
This document only specifies the minimum data models for response of UAS information associated to a DET. Other elements that MAY be required by policy are out of scope for this document.¶
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
3. URI Specification
The URIs to Private Information resources SHOULD follow those defined in [RFC9082]. For DRIP the /domain query format MUST be support for DETs.¶
4. Conformance Literal
The string literal drip_version_0 MUST be used in the rdapConformance section to signal conformance with this specification.¶
5. Extension Model
The data model for responses SHOULD follow the RDAP specification for results in [RFC9083]. For DRIP the additional data member is used to hold non-DNS based registration information. The following CDDL is the response model under the RDAP key of drip.¶
drip = {
serial_number: tstr .size(5..20),
csr: bstr,
x509: [+ bstr / #6.TBD],
? caa_assigned_id: tstr,
? f3411: {
? uas_type: nibble-field,
? uas_ids: uas-id-map,
? auths: [* auth-grp],
? self-grp,
? area-grp,
? classification-grp,
? operator-grp,
}
? utm: {
operational_intent: #6.37(bstr),
uss_uri: #6.32(tstr) / tstr
},
* tstr => any
}
uas-id-map = {
&uas-id-types: [+ uas-id]
}
uas-id-types = (none: 0, serial: 1, caa_id: 2, utm_id: 3, session_id: 4)
uas-id: tstr .size(1..20) / bstr .size(1..20)
auth-grp = (
a_type: nibble-field,
a_data: bstr .size(1..362)
)
area-grp = (
area_count: 1..255,
area_radius: float,
area_floor: float,
area_ceiling: float
)
classification-grp = (
ua_class: 0..8,
eu_class: nibble-field,
eu_category: nibble-field
)
self-grp = (
desc_type: nibble-field,
description: tstr .size(23)
)
operator-grp = (
operator_id_type: nibble-field,
operator_id: bstr .size(20)
)
nibble-field = 0..15
¶
7. IANA Considerations
7.1. RDAP Extensions Registry
This specification registers drip_version_0 extension.¶
Extension Identifier: drip_version_0
Registry Operator: Any
Specification: This RFC
Contact: IETF DRIP WG <tm-rid@ietf.org>
Intended Usage: This extension identifies additional data elements for
DRIP registrations in UAS RID.
¶
8. References
8.1. Normative References
- [RFC2119]
- Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
- [RFC8174]
- Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
- [RFC9082]
- Hollenbeck, S. and A. Newton, "Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Query Format", STD 95, RFC 9082, DOI 10.17487/RFC9082, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9082>.
- [RFC9083]
- Hollenbeck, S. and A. Newton, "JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)", STD 95, RFC 9083, DOI 10.17487/RFC9083, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083>.
8.2. Informative References
- [DET-DNS]
- Wiethuechter, A. and J. Reid, "DRIP Entity Tags (DET) in the Domain Name System (DNS)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-drip-registries-18, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-drip-registries-18>.
- [RFC8126]
- Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
- [RFC9153]
- Card, S., Ed., Wiethuechter, A., Moskowitz, R., and A. Gurtov, "Drone Remote Identification Protocol (DRIP) Requirements and Terminology", RFC 9153, DOI 10.17487/RFC9153, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9153>.
- [RFC9374]
- Moskowitz, R., Card, S., Wiethuechter, A., and A. Gurtov, "DRIP Entity Tag (DET) for Unmanned Aircraft System Remote ID (UAS RID)", RFC 9374, DOI 10.17487/RFC9374, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9374>.
- [RFC9434]
- Card, S., Wiethuechter, A., Moskowitz, R., Zhao, S., Ed., and A. Gurtov, "Drone Remote Identification Protocol (DRIP) Architecture", RFC 9434, DOI 10.17487/RFC9434, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9434>.
- [RFC9575]
- Wiethuechter, A., Ed., Card, S., and R. Moskowitz, "DRIP Entity Tag (DET) Authentication Formats and Protocols for Broadcast Remote Identification (RID)", RFC 9575, DOI 10.17487/RFC9575, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9575>.