Network Working Group Yacine El Mghazli
Internet Draft Arnaud Gonguet
Expires: December 2002 Alcatel
Thomas D. Nadeau
Cisco Systems
June 2002
A Framework for PPVPNs management
<draft-yacine-ppvpn-mgt-frwk-00.txt>
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
This document provides a framework for Provider Provisioned Virtual
Private Networks (PPVPNs) management. This framework intends to
produce a coherent description of the significant technical issues
which are important in the design of layer 3 PPVPN management
solution. Selection of specific approaches, making choices among
information models and protocols are outside of the scope of this
framework document.
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.....................................................4
1.1. Definition.....................................................4
1.2. Reference Models...............................................4
2. Customer Manager.................................................6
2.1. Customer Management Definition.................................6
2.2. Customer Management Information Model..........................7
2.2.1. SLA/SLS content..............................................7
2.3. Customer Management Functions..................................7
2.3.1. Fault management.............................................8
2.3.2. Configuration Management.....................................8
2.3.3. Accounting...................................................8
2.3.4. Performance Management.......................................9
2.3.5. Security Management..........................................9
2.3.5.1. Management Access Control..................................9
2.3.5.2. Authentication.............................................9
2.4. Customer Management Architecture..............................10
2.4.1. Functional Architecture.....................................10
2.4.2. Communication...............................................10
2.4.2.1. Customer Agent interface..................................10
2.4.2.2. Provider Network Management interface.....................10
3. Provider Network Manager........................................11
3.1. Provider Network Management Definition........................11
3.2. Network Management Functions..................................11
3.2.1. Fault management............................................11
3.2.2. Configuration Management....................................12
3.2.2.1. Configuration Management for PE-Based VPNs................12
3.2.2.2. Configuration management for CE-based VPNs................13
3.2.2.3. Provisioning Routing......................................13
3.2.2.4. Provisioning Network Access...............................13
3.2.2.5. Provisioning Security Services............................13
3.2.2.6. Provisioning VPN Resource Parameters......................13
3.2.2.7. Provisioning Value-Added Service Access...................14
3.2.2.8. Provisioning Hybrid VPN Services..........................15
3.2.3. Accounting..................................................15
3.2.4. Performance Management......................................15
3.2.5. Security Management.........................................15
3.3. Network Management Information models.........................16
3.4. Network Management Architecture...............................16
4. Devices.........................................................16
4.1. Information model.............................................16
4.1.1. Standard MIBs/PIBs..........................................16
4.1.1.1. Customer visible routing..................................16
4.1.1.2. Routing across the SP backbone............................16
4.1.1.3. VPN tunneling.............................................17
4.1.1.4. Quality of Service........................................17
4.1.2. PPVPN specific MIBs/PIBs....................................17
4.1.2.1. PE-based PPVPN............................................17
4.1.2.2. CE-based PPVPN............................................17
4.2. Communication.................................................17
4.2.1. SNMP........................................................18
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
4.2.2. COPS-PR.....................................................18
4.2.3. LDAP........................................................18
4.2.4. XML.........................................................18
5. Acknowledgments ................................................18
6. Intellectual Property...........................................18
7. Reference ......................................................18
8. Authors' Addresses .............................................20
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
1. Introduction
1.1. Definition
For any type of provider provisioned VPN it is useful to have one
place where the VPN can be viewed and optionally managed as a whole.
The Network Management System may therefore be a place where the
collective instances of a VPN are brought together into a cohesive
picture to form a VPN. To be more precise, the instances of a VPN on
their own do not form the VPN; rather, the collection of disparate
VPN sites together forms the VPN. This is important because VPNs are
typically configured at the edges of the network (i.e., PEs) either
through manual configuration or auto-configuration. This results in
no state information being kept in within the "core" of the network.
Sometimes little or no information about other PEs is configured at
any particular PE.
An SP and its customers must be able to manage the capabilities and
characteristics of their VPN services. To the extent possible,
automated operations and interoperability with standard management
platforms should be supported.
Two main management functions are identified:
- A customer management function:
provides the means for a customer agent to query or configure
customer specific information, or receive alarms regarding his or
her VPN. Customer specific information includes data related to
contact, billing, site, access network, IP address, routing
protocol parameters, etc. It may also include confidential data,
such as encryption keys. It may use a combination of proprietary
network management system, SNMP manager, PDP function or directory
service.
- A provider network management function:
provides many of the same capabilities as a customer network
management system across all customers. This would not include
customer confidential information, such as keying material. The
intent of giving the provider a view comparable to that of customer
network management is to aid in troubleshooting and problem
resolution. Such a system also provides the means to query,
configure, or receive alarms regarding any infrastructure
supporting the PPVPN service. It may use a combination of
proprietary network management system, SNMP manager, PDP function
or directory service (e.g., LDAP [RFC1777] [RFC2251]).
1.2. Reference Models
The ITU-T Telecommunications Management Network (TMN) model has the
following generic requirements structure:
- Engineer, deploy and manage the switching, routing and transmission
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
resources supporting the service, from a network perspective
(network element management);
- Manage the VPNs deployed over these resources (network management);
- Manage the VPN service (service management);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - -
Service +-------------+ : +----------+
Management | Customer |<------------------:----->| Customer |
Layer | Manager | : | Agent |
+-------------+ : +----------+
- - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - -
Network | +------------+ :
Management | | Provider | :
Layer | | Network | Customer
+------>| Manager | Interface
+------------+ :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - -
Network Element | :
Management | +------+ : +------+
Layer | | | : | CE |
+->| PE | : |device|
|device| : | of |
| |--:--|VPN A|
+------+ : +------+
---------------------------------------------->:<----------------
SP network : Customer Network
Figure 1: Reference Model for PE-based PPVPNs Management.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - -
Service +-------------+ : +----------+
Management | Customer |<------------------:----->| Customer |
Layer | Manager | : | Agent |
+-------------+ : +----------+
- - - - - - - - - - ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - -:- - - - - - - - -
Network | +------------+ :
Management | | Provider | :
Layer | | Network | Customer
+------>| Manager | Interface
+------------+ :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -^- - - -^- - - -:- - - - - - - - -
Network Element | +-------:---------------+
Management | +------+ : +------+ |
Layer | | | : | CE | |
+---->| PE | : |device|<----+
|device| : | of |
| |--:--|VPN A|
+------+ : +------+
---------------------------------------------->:<----------------
SP network : Customer Network
Figure 2: Reference Model for CE-based PPVPNs Management.
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
Figure 1 and 2 (see bellow) presents the reference model for
PE/CE-based PPVPN management, according to this generic structure.
In both models, the customer manager administrates customer specific
attributes, such as customer ID, personal information (e.g., name,
address, phone number, credit card number, and etc), subscription
services and parameters, access control policy information, billing
and statistical information, and etc.
In the PE-based reference model, the provider network manager
administrates devices attributes and their relationship, covering PE
devices and other devices constructing the concerned PE-based VPN.
In the CE-based reference model, the provider network manager
administrates device attributes and their relationship, covering PE
and CE devices that define the VPN connectivity of the customer VPNs.
Network and customer management systems responsible for managing VPN
networks have several challenges depending on the type of VPN network
or networks they are required to manage.
2. Customer Manager
The term "Virtual Private Network" (VPN) refers to the communication
between a set of sites, making use of a shared network
infrastructure. Multiple sites of a private network may therefore
communicate via the public infrastructure, in order to facilitate the
operation of the private network. The logical structure of the VPN,
such as addressing, topology, connectivity, reachability, and access
control, is equivalent to part of or all of a conventional private
network using private facilities.
The Customer Management function controls the PPVPN service
management at the Service Management Layer (SML) (see section 1.2).
It mainly consists in collecting the customer PPVPN services
requirements and performing some reporting for the customer. This
function is correlated with the Network Management function at the
Network Management Layer (NML) for initiating the PPVPN services
provisioning, and getting some service reporting.
2.1. Customer Management Definition
A customer must have a means to view the topology, operational state,
order status, and other parameters associated with his or her VPN.
All aspects of management information about CE devices and customer
attributes of a PPVPN manageable by an SP should be capable of being
configured and maintained by an authenticated, authorized customer
agent.
A customer agent should be able to make dynamic requests for changes
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
to traffic parameters. A customer should be able to receive real-time
response from the SP network in response to these requests. One
example of such as service is a "Dynamic Bandwidth management"
capability, that enables real-time response to customer requests for
changes of allocated bandwidth allocated to their VPN(s)[Y.1311.1].
A customer who may not be able to afford the resources to manage
their own sites should be able to outsource the management of his or
her VPN to the service provider(s) supporting the network.
2.2. Customer Management Information Model
This section presents the information model that is used for PPVPN
service management at the SML. The information models represent, for
a given purpose, the nature of the data to be managed, and way it is
represented. At the SML, the information model that is foreseen is
composed of Service Level Agreements (SLA) and Service Level
Specifications (SLS).
2.2.1. SLA/SLS content
Services are described through Service Level Agreements (SLA) which
are contractual documents between customers and service providers.
The technical par of the service is called the Service Level
Specification (SLS). The SLS groups different kinds of parameters.
Some are more related with the description of the transport of the
packets, and some with the specification of the service itself.
A Service Level Specification (SLS) may be defined per access network
connection, per VPN, per VPN site, and/or per VPN route. The service
provider may define objectives and the measurement interval for at
least the SLS using the following Service Level Objective (SLO)
parameters:
- QoS and traffic parameters for the Intserv flow or Diffserv class
- Availability for the site, VPN, or access connection
- Duration of outage intervals per site, route or VPN
- Service activation interval (e.g., time to turn up a new site)
- Trouble report response time interval
- Time to repair interval
- Total traffic offered to the site, route or VPN
- Measure of non-conforming traffic for the site, route or VPN
The service provider and the customer may negotiate a contractual
arrangement that includes a Service Level Agreement (SLA) regarding
compensation if the provider does not meet an SLS performance
objective.
Traffic parameters and actions should be defined for packets to and
from the demarcation between the service provider and the site. For
example, policing may be defined on ingress and shaping on egress.
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
2.3. Customer Management Functions
This section presents detailed customer management functions in the
traditional fault, configuration, accounting, performance, and
security (FCAPS) management categories. Much of this text was adapted
from [Y.1311.1].
2.3.1. Fault management
Basically the fault management function of the Customer Manager is
provided with network layer failure information and reports incidents
to the impacted customers. The Customer Management function support
for fault management includes:
- indication of customers impacted by failure,
- incident recording or logs.
2.3.2. Configuration Management
The configuration management function of the Customer Manager must
enable to configure PPVPN services parameters with the level of
detail that the customer is able to notify, according to service
templates defined by the provider.
A service template contains fields which, when instantiated, yield a
definite service requirement or policy. For example, a template for
an IPSec tunnel would contain fields such as tunnel end points,
authentication modes, encryption and authentication algorithms,
preshared keys if any, and traffic filters. A BGP/MPLS service
template would contain fields such as the sites that need to form a
VPN. A QoS agreement template would contain fields such as delay,
jitter, throughput and packet loss thresholds as well as end points
over which the QoS agreement has to be satisfied. In general, a
customer's service order can be regarded as a set of instantiated
service templates. This set can, in turn, be regarded as the logical
or service architecture of the customer's VPN. The set of service
templates should be comprehensive in that they can capture all
service orders in some meaningful sense.
2.3.3. Accounting
Basically the accounting management function of the Customer Manager
is provided with network layer measurements information and manage
this information. The Customer Manager is responsible for the
following accounting functions:
- retrieval of accounting information from the Provider Network
Manager,
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
- analysis, storage and administration of measurements.
Some providers may require near-real time reporting of measurement
information, and may offer this as part of a customer network
management service.
If an SP supports a "Dynamic Bandwidth management" service, then the
dates, times, amounts and interval required to perform requested
bandwidth allocation change(s) must be traceable for monitoring and
accounting purposes.
Solutions should state compliance to accounting requirements, as
described in section 1.7 of [RFC2975].
2.3.4. Performance Management
From the Customer Manager perspective, Performance management
includes functions involved with determination of conformance to
Service Level Specifications (SLS), such as QoS and availability
measurements. The objective is to correlate accounting information
with performance and fault management information to produce billing
that takes into account SLA provisions for periods of time where the
SLS is not met.
Performance management should also support analysis of important
aspects of a PPVPN, such as bandwidth utilization, response time,
availability, QoS statistics, and trends based on collected data.
2.3.5. Security Management
From the Customer Manager perspective, the security management
function includes management features to guarantee the security of
device, access connections, and protocols within the PPVPN
network(s).
2.3.5.1. Management Access Control
Management access control determines the privileges that a user has
for particular applications and parts of the network. Without such
control, only the security of the data and control traffic is
protected, leaving the devices providing the PPVPN network
unprotected. Access control capabilities protect these devices to
ensure that users have access to only the resources and applications
to which they are authorized to use.
2.3.5.2. Authentication
Authentication is the process of verifying that the sender is
actually is who he or she says they are. The Customer Manager must
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
support standard methods for authenticating users attempting to
access management services.
Scalability is critical as the number of nomadic/mobile clients is
increasing rapidly. The authentication scheme implemented for such
deployments must be manageable for large numbers of users and VPN
access points.
Support for strong authentication schemes shall be supported to
ensure the security of both VPN access point-to-VPN access point (PE
to PE) and client-to-VPN Access point (CE-to-PE) communications. This
is particularly important to prevent VPN access point spoofing. VPN
Access Point Spoofing is the situation where an attacker tries to
convince a PE or CE that the attacker is the VPN Access Point. If an
attacker can convinces a PE or CE of that, then the device will send
VPN traffic to the attacker (who could forward it on to your true
access point after compromising confidentially or integrity).
In other words, a non-authenticated VPN AP can be spoofed with a
man-in-the-middle attack, because the endpoints never verify each
other. A weakly-authenticated VPN AP may be subject to such an
attack. However, strongly-authenticated VPN APs are not subject to
such attacks, because the man-in-the-middle cannot authenticate as
the real AP, due to the strong authentication algorithms.
2.4. Customer Management Architecture
This section proposes a PPVPN management framework high level
architecture for the SML. The goal is to map the customer management
functions described in section 2.3 to architecture functional blocks,
and to describe the communication with the other PPVPN management
functions.
2.4.1. Functional Architecture
Two main functional blocks can be recognized:
- A PPVPN Service Manager, for defining the PPVPN services and
initiating the services provisioning. This block takes as inputs
the Customer Agent requirements and as output the Provider Network
Management provisioning system.
- A PPVPN Service Assurance Manager, for managing services failure
and performing customer reporting. This block takes as input the
Provider Network Management assurance system and as output the
Customer Agent.
2.4.2. Communication
2.4.2.1. Customer Agent interface
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
TBD
2.4.2.2. Provider Network Management interface
TBD
3. Provider Network Manager
3.1. Provider Network Management Definition
A service provider must have a means to view the topology,
operational state, order status, and other parameters associated with
each customer's VPN. Furthermore, the service provider must have a
means to view the underlying logical and physical topology,
operational state, provisioning status, and other parameters
associated with the equipment providing the VPN service(s) to its
customers.
Currently, proprietary methods are often used to manage VPNs. The
additional expense associated with operators having to use multiple
proprietary management methods (e.g., command line interface (CLI)
languages) to access such systems is undesirable. Therefore, devices
should provide standards-based interfaces wherever feasible.
3.2. Network Management Functions
This section presents detailed provider network management functions
in the traditional fault, configuration, accounting, performance, and
security (FCAPS) management categories. Much of this text was adapted
from ITU-T [Y.1311.1].
3.2.1. Fault management
Provider Network Manager support for fault management includes:
- fault detection (incidents reports, alarms, failure visualization),
- fault localization (analysis of alarms reports, diagnostics),
- corrective actions (traffic, routing, resource allocation).
Since PE-based PPVPNs rely on a common network infrastructure, the
Provider Network Manager provides a means to inform the CM on the VPN
customers impacted by a failure in the infrastructure. The Provider
Network Manager should provide pointers to the related customer
configuration information to aid in fault isolation and the
determination of corrective action.
It is desirable to detect faults caused by configuration errors,
because these may cause VPN service to fail, or not meet other
requirements (e.g., traffic and routing isolation). Detection of such
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
errors is inherently difficult because the problem involves more than
one node and may reach across a global perspective. One approach
could be a protocol that systematically checks that all constraints
and consistency checks hold among tunnel configuration parameters at
the various end points.
A capability to verify L3 reachability within a VPN must be provided
for diagnostic purposes.
A capability to verify the parameter configuration of a device
supporting a PPVPN must be provided for diagnostic purposes.
3.2.2. Configuration Management
Overall, the Provider Network Manager must support configuration
necessary to realize desired L3 reachability of a PPVPN. Toward this
end, an Provider Network Manager must provide configuration
management to provision at least the following PPVPN components:
PE,CE, hierarchical tunnels, access connections, routing, and QoS, as
detailed in this section. If shared access to the Internet is
provided, then this option must also be configurable.
Since VPN configuration and topology are highly dependent upon a
customer's organization, provisioning systems must address a broad
range of customer specific requirements. The Provider Network Manager
must ensure that these devices and protocols are provisioned
consistently and correctly.
Provisioning for adding or removing sites should be as localized and
automated as possible.
The Provider Network Manager should provide means for translating
instantiated service templates into device configurations so that
associated services can be provisioned.
Finally, the approach should provide means for checking if a service
order is correctly provisioned. This would represent one method of
diagnosing configuration errors. Configuration errors can arise due
to a variety of reasons: manual configuration, intruder attacks,
conflicting service requirements.
3.2.2.1. Configuration Management for PE-Based VPNs
Requirements for configuration management unique to a PE-based VPN
are as follows.
- The Provider Network Manager must support configuration of at least
the following aspects of a L3 PE routers: intranet and extranet
membership, CE routing protocol for each access connection, routing
metrics, tunnels, etc.
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
- The Provider Network Manager should use identifiers for SPs,
PPVPNs, PEs, CEs, hierarchical tunnels and access connections as
described in [PPVPN-FRWK].
- Tunnels must be configured between PE and P devices. This requires
coordination of identifiers of tunnels, hierarchical tunnels, VPNs,
and any associated service information, for example, a QoS service.
- Routing protocols running between PE routers and CE devices must be
configured per VPN.
- For multicast service, multicast routing protocols must also be
configurable.
- Routing protocols running between PE routers and between PE and P
routers must also be configured.
- The configuration of a PE-based PPVPN must be coordinated with the
configuration of the underlying infrastructure, including Layer 1
and 2 networks interconnecting components of a PPVPN.
3.2.2.2. Configuration management for CE-based VPN
Requirements for configuration management unique to a CE-based VPN
are as follows.
- Tunnels must be configured between CE devices. This requires
coordination of identifiers of tunnels, VPNs, and any associated
service information, for example, a QoS service.
- Routing protocols running between PE routers and CE devices must be
configured. For multicast service, multicast routing protocols must
also be configurable.
3.2.2.3. Provisioning Routing
The Provider Network Manager must provision parameters for the IGP
for a PPVPN. This includes link level metrics, capacity, QoS
capability, and restoration parameters.
3.2.2.4. Provisioning Network Access
The Provider Network Manager must provision network access between
SP-managed PE and CE, as well as the case where the customer manages
the CE (CE-based PPVPNs).
3.2.2.5. Provisioning Security Services
When a security service is requested, the Provider Network Manager
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
must provision the entities and associated parameters involved with
the service. For example, for IPsec service, tunnels, options, keys,
and other parameters must be provisioned at either the CE and/or PE.
In the case of a intrusion detection service, the filtering and
detection rules must be provisioned on a VPN basis.
3.2.2.6. Provisioning VPN Resource Parameters
A service provider must have a means to dynamically provision
resources associated with VPN services. For example, in a PE-based
service, the number and size of virtual switching and forwarding
table instances must be provisionable.
Dynamic VPN resource assignment is crucial to cope with the frequent
changes requests from customer's (e.g., sites joining or leaving a
VPN), as well as to achieve scalability. The PEs should be able to
dynamically assign the VPN resources. This capability is especially
important for dial and wireless VPN services.
If an SP supports a "Dynamic Bandwidth management" service, then the
dates, times, amounts and interval required to perform requested
bandwidth allocation change(s) must be traceable for accounting
purposes.
If an SP supports a "Dynamic Bandwidth management" service, then the
provisioning system must be able to make requested changes within the
ranges and bounds specified in the Service Level Specifications.
Example QoS parameters are response time and probability of being
able to service such a request.
3.2.2.7. Provisioning Value-Added Service Access
A PPVPN service provides controlled access between a set of sites
over a common backbone. However, many service providers also offer a
range of value-added services, for example: Internet access, firewall
services, intrusion protection, IP telephony and IP Centrex,
application hosting, backup, etc. It is outside of the scope of this
document to define if and how these different services interact with
the VPN in order to solve issues such as addressing, integrity and
security. However, the VPN service must be able to provide access to
these various types of value-added services.
A VPN service should allow the SP to supply the customer with
different kinds of standard IP services like DNS, NTP and RADIUS
needed for ordinary network operation and management. The provider
should be able to provide IP services to multiple customers from one
or many servers.
A firewall function may be required to restrict access to the PPVPN
from the Internet [Y.1311].
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
A managed firewall service must be carrier grade. For redundancy and
failure recovery, a means for firewall fail-over should be provided.
Managed firewall services that may be provided include dropping
specified protocol types, intrusion protection, traffic-rate limiting
against malicious attacks, etc.
Managed firewalls must be supported on a per-VPN basis, although
multiple VPNs may be supported by the same physical device (e.g., in
network or PE-based solution). Managed firewalls should be provided
at the major access point(s) for the PPVPN. Managed firewall services
may be embedded in the CE or PE devices, or implemented in standalone
devices.
The Provider Network Manager should allow a customer to outsource the
management of an IP networking service to the SP providing the VPN or
a third party.
The management system should support collection of information
necessary for optimal allocation of IP services in response to
customer orders.
Reachability to and from the Internet to sites within a VPN must be
configurable by an SP. This could be controlled by configuring
routing policy to control distribution of VPN routes advertised to
the Internet.
3.2.2.8. Provisioning Hybrid VPN Services
Configuration of interworking or interconnection between PPVPN
solutions should be also supported. Ensuring that security and
end-to-end QoS issues are provided consistently should be addressed.
3.2.3. Accounting
The Provider Network Manager is responsible for the measurements of
resource utilization.
3.2.4. Performance Management
From the Provider Network Manager perspective, Performance management
includes functions involved with monitoring and collecting
performance data regarding devices, facilities, and services.
The Provider Network Manager must monitor device behavior to evaluate
performance metrics associated with an SLS. Different measurement
techniques may be necessary depending on the service for which an SLA
is provided. Example services are QoS, security, multicast, and
temporary access. These techniques may be either intrusive or
non-intrusive depending on the parameters being monitored.
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
The Provider Network Manager must also monitor aspects of the VPN not
directly associated with an SLS, such as resource utilization, state
of devices and transmission facilities, as well as control of
monitoring resources such as probes and remote agents at network
access points used by customers and mobile users.
Devices supporting PPVPN SLSs should have real-time performance
measurements that have indicators and threshold crossing alerts. Such
thresholds should be configurable.
3.2.5. Security Management
From the Provider Network Manager perspective, the security
management function of the Provider Network Manager must include
management features to guarantee the security of customer data and
control as described in section 5.9 of [PPVPN-REQ].
3.3. Network Management Information models
TBD
3.4. Network Management Architecture
TBD
4. Devices
4.1. Information model
Each PPVPN solution approach must specify the management or policy
information bases (MIBs or PIBS) for network elements involved in
PPVPN services. This is an essential requirement in network
provisioning. The approach should identify any PPVPN specific
information not contained in a standard MIB.
4.1.1. Standard MIBs/PIBs
4.1.1.1. Customer visible routing
According to section 3.3 of [PPVPN-FRWK], the following technologies
are available for the exchange of routing information at the customer
interface level. The corresponding MIBs can be used for
managing routing accross the customer interface.
o Static routing
o RIP (Routing Information Protocol)
o OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
o IS-IS (intermediate system to intermediate system)
o BGP-4 (Border Gateway Protocol version 4)
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
4.1.1.2. Routing across the SP backbone
According to section 4.4 of [PPVPN-FRWK], the following technologies
are available for routing within the SP network:
o Per-VPN routing model
- Static routing
- RIP
- OSPF
- IS-IS
- BGP-4
o Aggregated routing model
- MP-iBGP [MP-BGP4]
- OSPF
4.1.1.3. VPN tunneling
According to section 4.4 of [PPVPN-FRWK], the following technologies
are available for VPN tunneling within the SP network:
o MPLS
o GRE
o IPSec ([IPSEC-MIB], [IPSEC-PIB])
o IP-in-IP
4.1.1.4 Quality of Service
According to section 4.5 of [PPVPN-FRWK], the following technologies
are available for QoS support within the SP network:
o DiffServ ([RFC3289], [DS-PIB])
o RSVP signaling
4.1.2. PPVPN specific MIBs/PIBs
4.1.2.1. PE-based PPVPN
o Layer 3 VPNs
- BGP/MPLS VPNs ([MIB-2547], [PIB-2547])
- Virtual Routers ([VR-MIB])
- TBD
o Layer 2 VPNs:
- TBD
4.1.2.2. CE-based PPVPN
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
o TBD
4.2. Communication
Support of any one VPN may span a wide range of network equipment,
potentially including equipment from multiple implementors. Allowing
a unified network management view of the VPN therefore is simplified
through use of standard management interfaces and models. This will
also facilitate customer self-managed (monitored) network devices or
systems.
In cases where significant configuration is required whenever a new
service is provisioned, it is important for scalability reasons that
the NMS provide a largely automated mechanism for this operation.
Manual configuration of VPN services (i.e., new sites, or
re-provisioning existing ones), could lead to scalability issues, and
should be avoided. It is thus important for network operators to
maintain visibility of the complete picture of the VPN through the
NMS system. This must be achieved using standard protocols such as
SNMP, COPS, XML, or LDAP. Use of proprietary command-line interfaces
is highly undesirable for this task, as they do not lend themselves
to standard representations of managed objects.
4.2.1. SNMP
TBD
4.2.2. COPS-PR
The COPS-PR protocol [COPS-PR] offers significant advantages when
dealing with dynamic configuration and when compared to traditional
management solutions. Moreover, dynamic VPN resource assignment is
crucial to cope with the frequent changes requests from customer's
(e.g., sites joining or leaving a VPN), as well as to achieve
scalability. The PEs should be able to dynamically assign the VPN
resources. This capability is especially important for dial and
wireless VPN services.
4.2.3. LDAP
TBD
4.2.4. XML
TBD
5. Acknowledgments
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
Special Thanks to Nathalie Charton and Alban Couturier for their
valuable comments.
6. Intellectual Property
Intellectual property rights may have been claimed with regard to
some of the techniques and mechanisms described in this framework
document. For more information consult the online list of claimed
rights maintained by the IETF at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.html.
7. References
[PPVPN-REQ]
M. Carugi, D. McDysan, L. Fang, F. Johansson, Ananth Nagarajan
J. Sumimoto, R. Wilder, 'Service requirements for Layer 3
Provider Provisioned Virtual Private',
draft-ietf-ppvpn-requirements-04.txt , March 2002.
[PPVPN-FRWK]
R. Callon, M. Suzuki, J. De Clercq, B. Gleeson, A. Malis, K.
Muthukrishnan, E. Rosen, C. Sargor, J. Yu, 'A Framework for
Layer 3 Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Networks',
draft-ietf-ppvpn-framework-05.txt>, April 2002.
[RFC2096]
F. Baker, 'IP Forwarding Table MIB', RFC2096, January 1997.
[MP-BGP4]
D Katz, Yakov Rekhter, T. Bates, R.Chandra, 'Multiprotocol
Extensions for BGP-4', draft-ietf-idr-rfc2858bis-02.txt,
April 2002.
[IPSEC-PIB]
Avri Doria, David Arneson, Jamie Jason,Cliff Wang, Markus
Stenberg, Man Li, 'IPSec Policy Information Base',
draft-ietf-ipsp-ipsecpib-04.txt, February 2002.
[RFC3289]
F. Baker, K. Chan, A. Smith, 'Management Information Base for
the Differentiated Services Architecture', RFC3289, May2002.
[DS-PIB]
Keith McCloghrie, Mike Fine, 'Differentiated Services Quality
of Service Policy Information Base',
draft-ietf-diffserv-pib-09.txt, June 2002.
[MIB-2547]
Thomas Nadeau, 'MPLS/BGP Virtual Private Network Management
Information Base UsingSMIv2',
draft-ietf-ppvpn-mpls-vpn-mib-04.txt, May 2002.
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT A Framework for PPVPNs management June 2002
[PIB-2547]
Yacine El Mghazli, 'BGP/MPLS VPN Policy Information Base',
draft-yacine-ppvpn-2547bis-pib-01.txt, June 2002.
[Y.1311.1]
Carugi M., "Network Based IP VPN over MPLS
architecture",Y.1311.1 ITU-T Recommendation, May 2001
(http://ppvpn.francetelecom.com/ituRelated.html)
[Y.1311]
Knightson, K. (editor), " Network based IP VPN Service -
Generic Framework and Service Requirements ", Y.1311 ITU-T
Draft Recommendation, May 2001
(http://ppvpn.francetelecom.com/ituRelated.html)
[RFC 2975]
B. Aboba et al, "Introduction to Accounting Management",
October 2000.
8. Authors' Addresses
Yacine El Mghazli
Alcatel
Route de Nozay
F-91460 Marcoussis - FRANCE
Phone: +33 1 69 63 41 87
Email: yacine.el_mghazli@alcatel.fr
Arnaud Gonguet
Alcatel
Route de Nozay
F-91460 Marcoussis - FRANCE
Phone: +33 1 69 63 42 17
Email: arnaud.gonguet@alcatel.fr
Thomas D. Nadeau
Cisco Systems, Inc.
300 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824 - USA
Phone: +1-978-497-3051
Email: tnadeau@cisco.com
Design Team Expires December 2002 [Page 20]