Minutes IETF100: spring
minutes-100-spring-00

draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-03
Jeff Tantsura

Keyur: fairly simple draft, I like it

draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-routing-instruction-04
Xiaohu Xu

Discussion on both drafts

Adrian F. peace treaty has been signed. strategy for unified approach being
worked through

Xiaohu: I was not in that meeting

Ahmed: This belongs in SPRING, not in MPLS

Jeff T.: Does not matter where. ADs to decide.

Alvaro (as AD): would personally like to see it here in SPRING but this has
already been discussed between the chairs Should nevertheless be decided based
on future merged draft, though I still think this should be in SPRING

Wim: we should involve all uthors in the discussion

Adrian: Don't care where, both groups should nevertheless be involved

Loa: both documents are currently in Canddidate for Adoption state in MPLS.
Also 7510 was developed in MPLS.

Bruno: 7510 is not mpls specific in fact

Adrian: true but our focus is mpls

Wim: 7510 would not work for VXLAN

Bruno: true

Xiaohu: no strong opinion regarding which WG owns this

Loa: But you have requested adoption in mpls

Martin: we will not adopt one document in a WG and the other in the other WG

Bruno: when will new (merged) document be ready?

Adrian: best case 4 weeks

Himanshu: preference for SPRING to be the home

Alvaro: let's wait and decide

draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect-01
Adrian Farrel

[missed]

draft-clad-spring-segment-routing-service-chaining   /
draft-dawra-idr-bgp-sr-service-chaining Gaurav Dawra

Greg M. comparison with SFC is inapporpriate in draft. You should use exact
same terminology.

Gaurav: SFF is no different than SR forwarder

?: couldn't we just have a terminology mapping?

Ahmed: may not be a 1:1 mapping

?: if you reuse SFC architecture, then it would be good to ruse same
terminology.

draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment-00
Liang Geng, Mach Chen

Greg M.: you use both global and domaine unique. Which one is really intended?

Liang: domain unique

Greg: which goals do you have?

Liang: 3 UCs we've described

Dave A.: couple of interesting aspects to this draft. Interested in
participating.

?: other solutions exist for doing at least of of these UCs
?: PM can be done via steering

Omar: useful work but it needs to describe how transit nodes look into stack.

draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths-01
Shraddha Hegde

no question taken in interest of time

draft-dukes-sr-for-sdwan-00
Darren Dukes

Greg: for lattency and jitter, do you use live data?

Darren: depends on system used at the edge

Greg: how do you do detection?

Darren: up to CE to decide