Minutes IETF101: regext
minutes-101-regext-00

REGEXT meeting at IETF 101 London 2018-03-21 15:20-16:50

Co-chair James Galvin in the room
Co-chair Antoin Verschuren on jabber/meetecho

Jabber scribe:  Kal Feher
Minutes: Ulrich Wisser

Note well on screen

Introduction by James Galvin

Thanks to Roger Carney for the working session held on Monday, during which
we discussed the registry mapping in detail.  More on that below.

Published since last meeting: RFC 8334 Launch Phase Mapping for EPP

WG LC (waiting for shephard write up)
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-change-poll/
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token/

Validate, Roger Carney
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-validate/
Comment from Stéphane Bortzmeyer, use "zone" instead of TLD

Registry Mapping, Roger Carney
Open question on boot strap for registry mapping
Discussion about how to distribute the data and if it is public at all.
Question if this data should be in EPP, RDAP or something else.
Next step: make a draft, adaption

Milestones
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol/
Authors are not present, document might get removed from milestones if authors
don't press forward.
Comment is that document needs final fix and is then ready for LC.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration/

Documents not on milestones list
- Object tagging
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag/
  Document is almost ready for last call, needs review

- Validate
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-validate/

- Scott Hollenbeck asks about RDAP federated access
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-openid/

- James Gould, Verification code should stay on hold
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode/

- James Gould asks about data escrow data format documents

- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org-ext/
  LC as Informational or standards track

- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration/
  Needs to be tracked back with former area directors

James Galvin mentions that ICANN has a tech ops groups with many
registrars present.  This group will send documents for
standardization to the Regext WG.  Intense discussion about process
and involvement. To get standards people need to participate.

Some documents will need an update to wg charter. Right now only EPP
and RDAP are in scope.

Whoami, Gavin Brown
Replacement for registrant information in the registry.
Lively discussion, more negative then positive