Minutes IETF109: dmm
minutes-109-dmm-01
| Meeting Minutes | Distributed Mobility Management (dmm) WG | |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Minutes IETF109: dmm | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | plain text | |
| Last updated | 2020-12-01 |
minutes-109-dmm-01
DMM session IETF109
Minutes: Pablo Camarillo
Chairs introduction
Administrative & Intro
WG Document status
FPC: Unfortunately there is no progress to close it although document
is on the very last step
Rechartering discussion to happen
New items like integration of underlay and overlay; path steering on
N6; … (see chair slide)
Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G
Draft: draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility, Presents: Uma Chunduri
Pablo: The MTNC-id space seems small taking into account that it identifies an
slice and a path through the network. Why dont you decouple the slice
identifier from the path identifier? Uma: They are actually decoupled. See the
latest version of the draft, there’s a section specifically about it. Hanu: You
should have in mind what TEAS is doing. Uma: We are not conflicting with what
they are doing. Please let me know if there’s any conflict, but I dont think
that is the case.
Sri: Have you presented in other IETF WGs?
Uma: No, only in DMM.
Sri: The authors would like to do WG adoption right?; Yes
Sri: We will follow up with Erik on this.
Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane
Draft: draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch, Presents: Miya Kohno
Uma: Can you please confirm what is the relationship with the SRv6 draft?
Miya: Yes, this is related. This is presenting the architectural considerations
for it.
Hannu: -Bad audio- How are applications interacting with this common dataplane?
Miya: If there is a common dataplane in between the network and the compute
stack, then its easier to have end to end policies. SFC function mobility with
Mobile IPv6
Draft: draft-bernardos-dmm-sfc-mobility-01, Presents: Carlos Jesus Bernardos
Carlos: I would like to know whether this problem is interesting to the
community. Please read and share feedback.