Minutes IETF110: anima
minutes-110-anima-00
| Meeting Minutes | Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach (anima) WG | |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Minutes IETF110: anima | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | plain text | |
| Last updated | 2021-03-26 |
minutes-110-anima-00
ANIMA WG Agenda for IETF-110, Online
Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Chairs: Toerless Eckert & Sheng Jiang
14:30-15:30 UTC Wednesday, 10 March 2021
Minutes by: Juanna Dang
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
*************************************************************************
Slot 1: 10 min, Chair Slides - scribes, minutes, etc., 10 Min
Presenters Chairs - Sheng / Toerless
Sheng: 6 WG documents are in RFC Ed Queue and would be
published before next meeting. We would like to adopt more
relevant works.
*************************************************************************
Slot 2: C325, RFC Editor queue documents
Presenter: Michael Richardson
Toerless: I was in gather dot town going to the RFC editor dest,
so it's actually very nice tool especially for all these procedural
things. And the nice RFC editors were looking up their internal
cues and showing me the states what they were willing to say.
Publicly the author should receive author 48 notification within
a mouth.
Sheng: I would like to take this opportunity to see all those draft
orders for your patient and hard work.
*************************************************************************
Slot 3: Constrained Voucher Artifacts for Bootstrapping Protocols,
Presenter: Michael Richardson
Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-10
Robert Wilton: I just pick you up in your crosshair review. Have
you already take care of those reviews that you're needing?
I think you need me to try and help that.
Michael Richardson: I can't the chair need to push the button
for asking for reviews or you can do that, I've suggested to
review, suggest other people to review, they can add it as a
review wish. We got for BRSKI review, we got an IoT directorate
review, security review, agenda review, through big review.
About three or two year ago, I'd love some people to look at
that they already have criticism and are fixed.
Toerless: More than welcome. Next month, we' ll start the thread
on the mailing list, the chair will be happy to help.
*************************************************************************
Slot 4: Information Distribution over GRASP
Presenter: Jiang sheng
Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-grasp-distribution-01
Sheng: Hopefully we can be really stable for next meeting.
Toerless: I was just looking up the history and reminder the
documents has been because of the primarily. Our Focus on the
charter on the first ground. The charter has been carried on for
a very long time. We take that as work group document but I
think it has mature significant. I have much hope that we can
also try to start the thinking about its existing strategy to IESG
during this years. I review the changes with the feedback from
the Shepard. I would hope that towards the next meeting. We
will bring it up for last call.
*************************************************************************
Slot 5: BRSKI-AE Support for asynchronous enrollment
Presenter: Steffen Fries
Draft: draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-01
Slot 6: Constrained Join Proxy for Bootstrapping Protocols
Presenter: Michael Richardson
Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-02
Toerless: One question with respect to his ewing koa?
Michael Richardson: We' re not changing the collapse in any way.
In fact if anything the review we want from the tls working
group probably, because we are using a TLS components. It' s
my right to use co-op stateless to get the response back. We
can't use other protocol. The state part goes into a tls extension.
Toerless: No right or it have any quarrels with? You are doing so.
We don' t care about them but we should try to find the tls
review when it gets close to the end.
Michael Richardson: Now it is the time to get the review. Go to
working group to ask for last call.
*************************************************************************
Slot 7: Guidelines for Autonomic Service Agents,
Presenter: Laurent Ciavaglia
Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-01
Non-WG Documents
*************************************************************************
Slot 8: JOSE signed Voucher Artifacts for Bootstrapping Protocols,
Presenter: Michael Richardson
Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richardson-anima-jose-voucher-00
Toerless: Where is the user device that needs this?
Michael Richardson: The user is the OPC which is an industrial
IoT foundation that has existed. And they has indicated that
they are interested in adopting BRSKI. But they don't want to
do the CMS.
Toerless: I am always see the detailed explanation in the documents.
Michael Richardson: We can get some clear statement as who
is doing it there.
Toerless: It looks to me that they plug into some other workflow.
Michael Richardson: They plug it into BRSKI.
Toerless: The whole work is out of existing draft, but they are the
reason they don't like CMS.
Michael Richardson: That would involve them putting libraries and
code into devices they currently they don't use. They already are
using JWS in their code.
Toerless: It would be a great topic for IoT OPS to figure out how to
support or not support the variable preferences.
Michael Richardson: The Registrars have to support.