Skip to main content

Minutes IETF110: rtcweb
minutes-110-rtcweb-00

Meeting Minutes Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb) WG
Title Minutes IETF110: rtcweb
State Active
Other versions plain text
Last updated 2021-03-20

minutes-110-rtcweb-00
# RTCWEB@IETF110

Chairs: Sean Turner, Ted Hardie
Responsible AD: Murray Kucherawy

Note Taker: Eric Rescorla

## Logistics

### Time

FRIDAY, March 12, 2021 @ 1300-1500 UTC

### Meeting Information

Meetecho (a/v and chat):
https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf110/?group=rtcweb&short=&item=1

Audio (only):
http://mp3.conf.meetecho.com/ietf110/rtcweb/1.m3u

CodiMD:
https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-110-rtcweb

## Agenda

### Administrivia

Chair's Slides:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-rtcweb-rtcweb-chairs-slides-ietf-110-01

### "m=" re: bundle-only

Justin Uberti's Slides:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-rtcweb-aligning-jsep-bundle-00

#### Aligning JSEP+BUNDLE

Resolution 1.
1. Switch BUNDLE to match JSEP [Christer volunteered to do it].
(14 hands in favor, none against)
3. Create a new "max-bundle-safe" [name TBD] with current
"max-bundle-behavior". Document that "max-bundle" used to exist and now has
unspecified and deprecated behavior. (14 hands in favor, none against)

Separately, libwebrtc will try to migrate to specified behavior [non-IETF
action]

Need to discuss with ADs where bundle work happens.

Plan is to re-rev JSEP in place rather than to do a patch draft. Christer will
discuss the same thing for BUNDLE with the ADs and chairs.

#### a=bundle-only for a m= line not in a BUNDLE group

What happens if someone sends you a=bundle-only for an m= line not in a bundle
group (can happen if an endpoint just copies attributes)

Option 1:
BUNDLE implementations must ignore a=bundle-only for m= lines not in a BUNDLE
group

Option 2:
Generate an error (some debate about whether it actually is an error according
to the current specs)

Resolution: discuss on mmusic list and with ADs whether we should do this.

### NAT Slipsteam

Harald Alvestrand's Slides:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-rtcweb-nat-slipstream-00

Sense of the room is that this is not specific to RTCWEB and should be handled
elsewhere. Should be discussed at DISPATCH.