Minutes IETF111: calext
|Meeting Minutes||Calendaring Extensions (calext) WG|
|Title||Minutes IETF111: calext|
|Other versions||plain text|
# Agenda - IETF111 CALEXT * Note well, logistics, and introduction * WG status * -icalendar-series * -jscalendar-icalendar * -serverside-subscriptions * -subscription-upgrade * -vpoll # Minutes Francesca: hi :) ### Agenda Bashing Mike: should have relations as well. Daniel: which one should we pick? Mike: actually, task extensions as well. We should concentrate on tasks and relations because they're useful for the mapping. Daniel: tasks has been on call for adoption. Bron: call for adoption has passed, Mike will upload a new version. ACTION: Mike to upload tasks doc as draft-ietf-calext-ical-tasks or so Daniel: expect relation to be done in the next month? Mike: yes, think so. Daniel: is that the one with Cyrus? Mike: no, it's the one with temporal relations, etc. Daniel: OK, let's focus on relations for the next month and then tasks. ACTION: Mike to upload refreshed copy of draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations ACTION: Bron to issue WGLC on ical-relations Francesca: well done with jscalendar, congratulations. The RFC has a number of registries, now need to find designated experts. * Daniel: think we responded to that email. Think we proposed Neil, Robert and Mike. * Francesca: will reach out to them. ACTION: Francesca to select designated experts for jscalendar registries ## jscalendar-icalendar Proposal: separate RFC for fractional seconds in iCalendar Mike: ical4j in the past wouldn't handle events deeply enough embedded for eventpub, fixed now. Unless you have a protocol, you can't negotiate! e.g. iMIP. #### fractional seconds Mike: with fractional seconds, probably start off not supporting fractional seconds because the internal implementation doesn't. Likewise with CalDAV. Posted a draft for the fractional parameter, and almost immediately decided not to do it. If we want to support fractional seconds in icalendar, we should just support them throughout! Robert: agreed. #### ID property Robert: a LOCATION object in JSCalendar can also have links, which can created cross references within the iCalendar. Add a new 'ID' property? Bron: would want to constrain the value to be an OBJECTID. Mike: agree that we shouldn't make it specific to JSCalendar in the name, we may find other uses for it. #### VLOCALIZATION Mike: have been saying we need localisation for some time, so happy to help define it. We agreed maybe to do that as a separate document. Mike: given that it's effectively a new feature, we can probably put it off for now and do a separate VLOCALIZATION spec which also does the mapping to JSCalendar. .. Daniel: when do you think the JSCalendar mapping doc will be ready? Robert: not until the end of the year! Daniel: Dec 2021, or June 2022? Robert/Mike: let's aim for December, but without fractional seconds or localisation. ACTION: Mike and Robert to split localisation, IDs and fractional seconds out into one or more icalendar RFCs ACTION: Mike and Robert to keep working on JSCalendar mapping document ## Docs in AUTH48 ### eventpub * waiting for AD to validate ### valarm * waiting for AD to validate ## Milestones Live edited during session! Serverside subscriptions -> haven't heard back from Apple yet, move to next year. VPOLL into next year. ## Any other business? Nobody popped up with anything.