Minutes IETF120: bier: Thu 20:00
minutes-120-bier-202407252000-00
| Meeting Minutes | Bit Indexed Explicit Replication (bier) WG | |
|---|---|---|
| Date and time | 2024-07-25 20:00 | |
| Title | Minutes IETF120: bier: Thu 20:00 | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | markdown | |
| Last updated | 2024-08-09 |
IETF 120 BIER Session Agenda
WG info: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/bier/about/
Chairs:
Greg Shepherd (gjshep@gmail.com)
Tony Przygienda (tonysietf@gmail.com)
Secretary:
Zheng(Sandy) Zhang (zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn)
Thursday Session II 13:00-14:30 Local time, July 25, 2024
-
WG Status, Chairs
About the milestone updating, poll result: yes 7, no 0, no opnion 0; -
draft-zzhang-bier-unmasked-bier, Tony Przygienda
Jeff Tantsura: Highly support this draft. The BFR-ID may belong to
different set. Needs to be hardware friendly.
Tony Przygienda: Yes, needs to be translated to set lookup as
simplest solution but there are other tricks.
Others invited to contribute. -
draft-zzhang-bier-brownfield-options, Jeffrey Zhang
Hooman Bidgoli: If some overlay technologies should be included in
this draft, such pim over bier or mldp, etc.
Hooman Bidgoli: Alvaro suggested the PIM light draft.
Jeffrey Zhang: It's a good idea to cover overlay info here.
Tony Przygienda: The DR election function used by all the overlay
protocols is needed to be put in place. Did the work progress?
Hooman Bidgoli: The part is missing because there is no hello in PIM
light and hence they did yet another thing.
Agree with the work adding DR election part in the draft is needed.Chair start the adoption poll for this draft: yes 5, no 0, no
oponion 0. -
draft-liu-bier-uloop, Yuanxiang Qiu
Tony Przygienda: This looks like IGP protection pretty much and rLFA
would do same without delays introduced here. The
point-to-multipoint protection is interesting but what kind of p2mp
would you use for that?
Jeffrey Zhang: If just using the existing technology for backup
calculation, what's the difference?
Yuanxiang Qiu: The first difference is the address used to calculate
the PQ space. BIER uses the BFR prefix of BFER, while unicast uses
the address of the destination node. The second is whether the
method of establishing a repair path needs to distinguish between
fault and fault recovery. The third is that if multiple BFERs has
the same repair path, BIER can share path.
Jeffrey Zhang: In IGP backup calculation calculates the path to
prefix, in BIER calculation the path to BFR-ID, they are individual
calculation. So if you break down, you need to reuse igp
calculation.