Minutes for REGEXT at IETF-96
minutes-96-regext-1

REGEXT WG meeting at IETF 96 Berlin 20th July 2016 15:50-17:20

WG chair Jim Galvin opens meeting  (Co-Chair Antoin Verschuren remote)

Signed-Mark has become RFC

draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
  Jim Galvin -  still in waiting for IPR specifics
  Rik Ribbers - asks Verisign to make an IPR statement accordance to BCP79
  Scott Hollenbeck (via jabber) - Verisign statement is in accordance with BCP79
  [editor's note: discussion is continuing on the mailing list]

draft-ietf-regext-launchphase
   Jim Galvin - tight coupling with tmch-func-spec, has to wait for
   tmch-func-spec Sean Turner (via Jabber) downref is possible Jim Galvin -
   tmch-func-spec is needed for implementation, so no downref possible

draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping
   Ulrich Wisser agreed to be the document shepherd

draft-ietf-regext-reseller / draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext
   Jim Galvin - not much discussion on mailinglist
   Lingh - requests more reviews, outstanding issues fixed, draft updated
   Alex Mayrhofer - volunteers to review,
   Francisco Lozano - Reseller will be optional
   Jody Kolker - To much information is required if only name is shown in whois
   Jim Galvin - This needs to be discussed on list
   James Gould (via Meetecho) - Information will be needed for future
   requirements Alex Mayrhofer - Extensions is not needed in operation,
   registry has no connection to reseller
      Reduce it to absolute minimum, only name
   James Gould - Wants the extensions to be open to a larger requirement
   Antoin Verschuren (via Jabber) - Resellers may have a connection to a
   registry in the future, e.g., changing delegation or DNSSEC information as
   3th party dns-operator. Then you’ll need more than just a name. Think of it
   more broadly. Go Daddy - Send name with create and be done??? Jim Galvin -
   take discussion to the list

draft-brown-epp-fees
   Alex Mayrhofer - Discussion on list concludes to move the document back to a
   previous version Jim Galvin - we are waiting on Gavin Brown to submit a new
   version and restart the discussion

draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration
   Jiankang Yao - Presents the extension
   Discussion in the room with many clarifying questions
   Marc Blanchet - We should not have multiple bundling extensions on standard
   track.
                   Merge the requirements of this one and CIRA (already on the
                   charter) and Gould’s one (not published) and possible ICANN
                   IDN variants work into a standard track extension.
   Marc committed to talk to the group of authors to start that thread.
   No consent on the specific bundling solutions
   Jim Galvin - further discussion needed

draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec
   Gustavo Lozano (via Meetecho) - Outstanding comments fixed, thinks draft is
   ready to be published Jody Kolker - where does 48 hour window policy come
   from Gustavo Lozano - timeline has been discussed Jody Kolker - get rid of
   timeline all together Scott Hollenbeck - IETF does not write ICANN policy,
   let's try to find reconciliation Jim Galvin - Ping to Patrik Fältström to
   provide feedback

draft-lozano-regext-epp-transf-contact-inf
draft-lozano-regext-rdap-transf-contact-inf
   Gustavo Lozano - Presents the extensions
   Discussion in room, draft needs more discussions on list

draft-carney-regext-validate
   Jody Kolker - presents the extension
   Discussion in room and Jabber
   Continue on the list

draft-carney-regext-domainconnect
   Jody Kolker - presents the extension
   Discussion in room and Jabber
   Continue on the list

draft-carney-regext-unavailable-domains
   Jody Kolker - presents the extension
   Continue on the list

draft-carney-regext-domain-fees
   Jody Kolker - presents the extension
   Patrick Mevzek - Please cross check with another extension done by Gavin
   Brown
       (detailed on mailinglist after the meeting to draft-brown-domain-pricing,
       not submitted at IETF but available on Centralnic gitlab server)
   Contine on the list

Jim Galvin asks for reviews on these drafts

Alex Mayrhofer please WG we have a lot of documents, very few reviews

Meeting closed by Jim Galvin