Minutes interim-1995-iesg-15 1995-09-14 15:30
minutes-interim-1995-iesg-15-199509141530-00
| Meeting Minutes | Internet Engineering Steering Group (iesg) IETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Date and time | 1995-09-14 15:30 | |
| Title | Minutes interim-1995-iesg-15 1995-09-14 15:30 | |
| State | (None) | |
| Other versions | plain text | |
| Last updated | 2024-02-23 |
minutes-interim-1995-iesg-15-199509141530-00
Minutes of the IESG Teleconferences
INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
September 14, 1995
Reported by: Steve Coya, IETF Executive Director
This report contains IESG meeting notes, positions and action items.
These minutes were compiled by the IETF Secretariat which is supported
by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NCR-9528103
For more information please contact the IESG Secretary at
<iesg-secretary@ietf.cnri.reston.va.us>.
ATTENDEES
---------
Coya, Steve / CNRI
Halpern, Joel / Newbridge Networks
Kastenholz, Frank / FTP Software
Klensin, John / MCI
Mankin, Allison & family / ISI & Mankin Productions
O'Dell, Mike / UUNET
Schiller, Jeff / MIT
Thomson, Susan / Bellcore
Regrets
-------
Alvestrand, Harald / Uninett
Bradner, Scott / Harvard
Carpenter, Brian / CERN (IAB Liaison)
Kostick, Deirdre / AT&T Bell Labs
Mockapetris, Paul / @home
Rekhter, Yakov / cisco (IAB Liaison)
Reynolds, Joyce / ISI
Minutes
-------
1. The minutes from the August 31 teleconference were approved. Coya to
place in Shadow directories.
2. The IESG deferred action on Hypertext Markup Language -2.0
<draft-ietf-html-spec-05.txt>, a candidate for Proposed Standard. A
request was made to add clarification text to the document so that
implementation will not require historical (i.e. undocumented
folklore) knowledge to understand the applicability of the
specification. John will take this up with the working
group/document authors.
3. The IESG approved the publication of Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification <draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-spec-02.txt> as a
Proposed Standard. Coya to send announcement.
4. The IESG approved the publication of IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture <draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-03.txt> as a Proposed
Standard. Coya to send announcement.
5. The IESG approved the publication of Internet Control Message
Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
<draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-02.txt> as a Proposed Standard. Coya to send
announcement.
6. The IESG approved the publication of DNS Extensions to Support IP
Version 6 <draft-ietf-ipngwg-dns-00.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
Coya to send announcement.
A concern was raised pertaining to the coexistence of A and AAAA
records. It was explained that this is a transition issue and
addressed in the transition document, currently in last call. Coya
to send a separate note will be sent to the RFC Editors informing
them that Sue will be adding a reference to the approved document
prior to publication.
7. The IESG approved the publication of An Architecture for IPv6
Unicast Address Allocation
<draft-ietf-ipngwg-unicst-addr-allo-01.txt> as an Informational
RFC. Coya to send announcement.
8. The IESG approved the publication of A BGP/IDRP Route Server
alternative to a full mesh routing
<draft-haskin-bgp-idrp-mesh-routing-01.txt> as an Experimental
Protocol. Coya to send announcement.
9. The IESG tentatively approved the Guide for Internet Standards
Writers Working Group pending a revised charter from Mike. The
revision will clear up some items, and change the milestone so the
output is a BCP document instead of an Informational RFC.
If the revised charter meets these new requirements, the WG will be
announced. Otherwise, it will appear on the next telechat agenda.
10. Allison reported that some members of the IAB are concerned about
the MIME type registration procedures. John is concerned too :-)
The IAB asked the IESG to devise a process which is expeditious and
requires a last call period for registering new mime types. It was
noted that the last call period would not address the concerns
being raised. Further, there is no conflict resolution procedures
for mime types (two requests to register the same/some one else's
type).
However, John saw no problem with initiating a last call process,
but as it is a policy change, the IANA needs to agree to it.
John also reported a design team effort currently underway that
proposed to eliminate flat addresses space, which should go far in
addressing the current IAB concerns, but not all of them. The
proposal is expected in the next few weeks.