Minutes interim-2019-cbor-19: Wed 16:00
minutes-interim-2019-cbor-19-201911061600-00
| Meeting Minutes | Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions (cbor) WG Snapshot | |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Minutes interim-2019-cbor-19: Wed 16:00 | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | plain text | |
| Last updated | 2019-11-06 |
minutes-interim-2019-cbor-19-201911061600-00
CBOR WG Meeting - Interim 19
Wednesday, November 6, 2019, 16:00 - 17:00 UTC
Chairs: Francesca Palombini, Jim Schaad
Presents:
Francesca,
Carsten,
Laurence
* CDDL survey
Carsten to review and send comments to chairs
Chairs get it out hopefully before Singapore - what wgs?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8610/referencedby/ + ietf ml + Other SDOs
(Henk)? Discuss during f2f Ping after Singapore
* Agenda for IETF106 (chairs)
Proposal:
* Introduction [5'] : Chairs
* CBOR specification status [25'] : Carsten
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis
* CDDL cont. - Ways forward [15'] : Carsten / Chairs
* Flextime [10']
* Wrap-up [5'] : Chairs
* CBOR specification (Carsten)
#63 long time, need to decide if we want to do nothing and what the
implications are in the text. Jeffrey more on one side of the spectrum.
LL: nothing says any implementation has to do any particular set or subset.
True with every particular RFC. We can have shoulds about generic encoder
but not must. CB: must is in 4th paragraph of section 5.6
https://cbor-wg.github.io/CBORbis/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis.html#map-keys LL:
not ok Discuss in Singapore
#130 - Carsten to continue the discussion with Peter
#86 - Carsten thinks this can be closed, up to wg to say if not satisfied.
Put the results of Laurence not well formed in CBOR repo - test-cases - AP
Francesca
AP chairs: decide and announce date for WGLC
* AOB
Any activity CBOR related at the Hackathon? Not that we know of. Hannes RATS,
TEEP may have. SUIT, WISHI, COSE. Might be useful to find people at the
Hackathon to have a chat.