Skip to main content

Minutes interim-2020-cbor-05: Wed 16:00
minutes-interim-2020-cbor-05-202003111600-00

Meeting Minutes Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions (cbor) WG
Date and time 2020-03-11 16:00
Title Minutes interim-2020-cbor-05: Wed 16:00
State Active
Other versions plain text
Last updated 2020-03-12

minutes-interim-2020-cbor-05-202003111600-00
CBOR WG Meeting - Interim 20-05
Wednesday, March 11, 2020, 16:00 - 17:00 UTC
Chairs: Francesca Palombini, Jim Schaad

Recordings:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ix-oavgwV0&feature=youtu.be

Present:
Michael Richardson
Jim Schaad
Ira McDonald
Laurence Lundblade
Carsten Bormann
Francesca Palombini

* Planning
  * 107 replacement
  * bi-weekly, Wednesday 1600 UTC or ➔ 1700 CET/CEST? 1h
        Mcr: suggest next meeting April 8th

* CBOR Bis status update and open points
       * WGLC started
       * null vs undef (issue 170) -> found middle ground
       * discussed all PR except issue 164 --
       https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/issues/164 AP all to read carefully *
       165 AP all to review * 159 -- Laurence ok
           * Anybody who knows more implementers please reach out to get reviews

* Tags
  * date tag
  Driver Licence people need CBOR tag for date from RFC3339 (1+2 tag). Joerg
  earlier proposed a tag for both time of day and date, with proposal to spend
  1+1 tag. 2 options:
      1. register what Mike proposes and do Joerg proposal separately
      2. merge the proposals that would have both text and num date
   we can do registration as soon as the draft is stable.
   Carsten's preference to merge the proposal and register the date tag first,
   possibly later adding Joerg's other proposals Do we want to put the time of
   day tag and timezone in the same doc or separate?

   LL: difference between time and Mike's proposal?
   CB: full date, not point in time.

   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-cbor-date-tag-00
https://j-richter.github.io/CBOR/date.html

Ira: How do these types relate to the XML?
* https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/datatypes.html#dateTime
* https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/datatypes.html#time
* https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/datatypes.html#date
CB: we should look

LL: we should have cddl in the draft.

AP: add agenda slot

* Agenda IETF107
  - CBOR bis issues
  - date tag
  - CDDL freezer (if time allows)

MCR: CBOR bis would be an interesting topic for IAB tech plenary
CB: Maybe we should combine this with state of the work security (COSE, EAT )
JS: Need to write up something for the newsletter for COSE. Would make sense.
AP Francesca to send an email to Stephen.