Minutes interim-2020-cbor-14: Wed 17:00
minutes-interim-2020-cbor-14-202009021700-00
| Meeting Minutes | Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions (cbor) WG Snapshot | |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Minutes interim-2020-cbor-14: Wed 17:00 | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | plain text | |
| Last updated | 2020-09-02 |
minutes-interim-2020-cbor-14-202009021700-00
CBOR WG Meeting - Interim 20-14
Wednesday, Sept 2, 2020, 17:00 - 18:00 CEST
Chairs: Francesca Palombini, Jim Schaad
Recordings: TBD
Bluesheet:
1. Francesca Palombini, Ericsson
2. Jim Schaad, August Cellar
3. Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works
4. Peter Yee, AKAYLA
5. Carsten Bormann, Universitaet Bremen TZI
Agenda:
* WG Documents status update:
* draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-14
IESG telechat: 2020-09-10
Need to find a position at some point on documentation of tag validation by
implementers (SecDir revie)
* MR: Points in review may be relevant. Better to address points from
the AD directly. Partly depends on if he wants to engage in
discussion. * CB: Had a bit of back and forth - ended Aug 11. Pointer
on mailing list
Too wordy (genart review)
* draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06
IESG telechat: 2020-09-10
* draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-00
Like to understand the nesting issues. Still trying to find some way that
feels right. Need to continue discussion before deciding that may just need
to "kill" the feature. MR: Feel a bit that the nesting issue is a solution
seeking a problem. CB: Need to discuss with examples and not in a vacumm
but still need to get JS: Last suggestions in a mail message. Still don't
really like any answer CB: Some remaiments in the document which was more
sophisticated. Not trying to do prefix compression, just treat all of
these embedded values as if they are tagged. Example in figure 5 is
factoring out the tag, not a part of the value. Alts are restricting the
propation to nothing or by some set of rules. MR: Understands the rule to
be that it applies to everything in an array and to key parts of a map.
Understand that it has no meaning applied to a text string or integer.
Don't know about thing that are already tagged. CB: Try to write it up with
a specific proposal.
* Charter update
* Chairs are looking for objections at this point. (Most) people on call
have indicated support. * Chairs did have a short discussion w/ Barry after
IETF 108. * ACTION: Chairs will send to Barry for review.
* Adoption Calls
* Looking at CDDL Control and CBOR Packed as documents.
* If people don't have objects then just start the adoption calls now.
* ACTION: CHairs to issue adoption calls for 2 weeks ending next interim.
* AoB
* None.
* Agenda for next meeting
* IESG review comments
* Update on tags OID
* Adoption calls