Skip to main content

Minutes IETF 112 BOF coordination interim-2021-iesg-20 2021-09-15 16:00
minutes-interim-2021-iesg-20-202109151600-00

Meeting Minutes Internet Engineering Steering Group (iesg) IETF
Date and time 2021-09-15 16:00
Title Minutes IETF 112 BOF coordination interim-2021-iesg-20 2021-09-15 16:00
State (None)
Other versions plain text
Last updated 2024-02-23

minutes-interim-2021-iesg-20-202109151600-00
IETF 112 BoF Coordination Call
15 September 2021

Reported by: Amy Vezza, IETF Secretariat
Revised with notes from:

Additional reference materials available at the datatracker 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bof-requests)

ATTENDEES
---------------------

Ben Campbell (IAB)
Roman Danyliw (SEC)
Martin Duke (TSV)
Lars Eggert (IETF Chair)
Cullen Jennings (IAB)
Benjamin Kaduk (SEC)
Erik Kline (INT)
Warren Kumari (OPS/MGT)
Zhenbin Li (IAB)
Francesca Palombini (ART)
Tommy Pauly (IAB)
Colin Perkins (IRTF)
Alvaro Retana (RTG)
Zahed Sarker (TSV)
John Scudder (RTG)
Robert Wilton (OPS/MGT)
Amy Vezza (Secretariat)
Martin Vigoureux (RTG)
Éric Vyncke (INT)
Jiankang Yao (IAB)

REGRETS
------------------------

Jari Arkko (IAB)
Deborah Brungard (IAB)
Wes Hardaker (IAB)
Mirja Kühlewind (IAB Chair)
Murray Kucherawy (ART)
Jared Mauch (IAB)
Cindy Morgan (Secretariat)
Karen O'Donoghue (ISOC)
David Schinazi (IAB)
Russ White (IAB)


APPLICATIONS AND REAL-TIME AREA

NONE

GENERAL AREA

NONE

INTERNET AREA

NONE

OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT AREA

NONE

ROUTING AREA

NONE

SECURITY AREA

o SCIM Industry Next Steps (SINS)
Responsible Area Director: Roman Danyliw

Roman Danyliw introduced the SINS BoF and said that the BoF at IETF 111 was 
very successful. The group discussed re-opening the SCIM Working Group to do 
the work. He expects SCIM to be rechartered before IETF 112. The BoF will be 
the placeholder in the schedule if the rechartering of SCIM needs more time 
than expected.

The proposed SINS BoF was approved for IETF 112.

o Privacy Preserving Measurement (PPM)
Responsible Area Director: Roman Danyliw

Roman Danyliw introduced the PPM BoF effort and talked about the draft 
charter text. Éric Vyncke said the acronym was already creating confusion 
since it was so close to IPPM. Tommy Pauly and Zahed Sarker agreed. 

Ben Kaduk said he discussed the issue with the proponents, and "PPM" was 
discussed at length.

Cullen Jennings mentioned it would be helpful in the long term to get more 
than one use case. Roman agreed and would make sure the text for the charter 
would be clarified. 

Roman would also confirm the BoF name and acronym before scheduling.

The proposed PPM BoF was approved for IETF 112. Due to discussion, the 
BoF name and acronym were changed to Privacy Respecting Incorporation of 
Values (PRIV).

TRANSPORT AREA

NONE

IAB SESSIONS

NONE

IRTF SESSIONS

NONE

OTHER SESSIONS

NONE

There was a sort discussion on whether or not the second BoF coordination 
call for the final decision would be needed. They decided a second call would 
not be needed.