Minutes interim-2024-sidrops-01: Wed 14:00
minutes-interim-2024-sidrops-01-202406261400-00

SIDRops Virtual Interim on Wednesday, 26 June 2024
Minute taker: Krishnaswamy,

1) Agenda bashing, note taker

2) Open mic discussion on the following Internet-Drafts:
- draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile
- draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification
- draft-ietf-sidrops-rrdp-same-origin

3) Rudiger Volk
Questions and Suggestions for the ASPA based verification draft
Job: Appendix could be added with example with potential incongruence
that afftes the ASPA vaidations would have or would not have.
Randy: 1/3 of IPv6 enabled ASes do not have the same neighbor set in
IPv6 than in IPv4. Discussions of implecation in secuirity section
Sriram: provided calrifications on "Validation perstains to x.509.
Verification is validated ASPA objects in the form of Whitelist".
Securty considerations raised by Rodiger is incorporated.
Keyur: Taking AFI out of BGP is going to be dangerous from previouse
experinces with new SAFIs coming up like RIFT & LSVR. We should have an
appendix with details on neighborship with AFI agnostic way and see if
AFI is needed in future
Rudiger: Does ASPA needed if IPv6 neighbor set path is different than
IPv4 neighbor path?
Keyur: Need explanation of pros/cons of excluding AFI/SAFI

4) Job: draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile
Keyur: Without pacing can lead to BGP flaps
Job: Need to check how pacing to be added in current RT design

5) Sriram: draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification
Claudio: Algorithm is stable for more than year and if possible do
better documentation. Additional explanation can go to appendix
Sriram: Can be moved it to appendix if community agress
Keyur: Did we last call with IDR?
Russ: Waiting for ASPA profile to finish
Keyur: Cross reference is needed
Russ: Agree

6) Job: RRDP Same Origin Policy
(slides-interim-2024-sidrops-01-sessa-rrdp-same-origin-policy)

7) RFC 8210bis - path forward? version 2
(slides-interim-2024-sidrops-01-sessa-rfc-8210bis-path-forward-version-2)

3) Any other business