Minutes interim-2025-iab-10: Thu 01:00
minutes-interim-2025-iab-10-202503200100-00
| Meeting Minutes | Internet Architecture Board (iab) IETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Date and time | 2025-03-20 01:00 | |
| Title | Minutes interim-2025-iab-10: Thu 01:00 | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | plain text | |
| Last updated | 2025-06-16 |
minutes-interim-2025-iab-10-202503200100-00
Minutes of the 2025-03-20 IAB Business Meeting, Bangkok Present: Matthew Bocci Roman Danyliw (IETF Chair) Dhruv Dhody Liz Flynn (IETF Secretariat) Wes Hardaker Cullen Jennings Suresh Krishnan Mirja Kühlewind Cindy Morgan (IAB Executive Administrative Manager) Tommy Pauly (IAB Chair) Colin Perkins (IRTF Chair) David Schinazi Alvaro Retana Christopher Wood Qin Wu Olaf Kolkman Jana Iyengar Warren Kumari Jason Livingood Deb Cooley (IESG Liaison) Regrets: Alissa Cooper Dirk Kutscher (incoming IRTF Chair) Mark Nottingham Ryan Polk (ISOC Liaison) Greg Wood (IETF Director of Communications and Operations) 1. How the IAB Does its Work (Tommy, Mark) Tommy Pauly presented suggestions for a new model of meeting for the IAB. Instead of weekly hourlong meetings, the proposal is for fewer and longer full board meetings, with other work taking place in smaller committees and delegated to individual members. This should maximize participation while reducing time zone ' challenges. Warren Kumari noted that standing meeting times are useful because it's confusing to juggle multiple calendars and multiple times. Cullen Jennings added that his calendar is very full and it's difficult to schedule anything that's not far in advance. Suresh Krishnan suggested meeting as the full group once per month and trying this as an experiment. Jana Iyengar noted that this suggested cadence is similar to how many WGs meet. Several other members noted concerns but agreed to try the experiment. Tommy Pauly will continue working on a new schedule. 2. Boilerplate Liaison Statements The IETF receives many liaison statements from ITU-T, and the IETF does not always respond; this has caused some issues. Tommy Pauly suggested having all incoming liaison statements from ITU-T receive a standard response that their statement has been received. Mirja Kuehlewind suggested that all liaison statements go first to the liaison manager, who can reply if appropriate. Colin Perkins suggested that the Secretariat could send such a response, and there was some debate about which other bodies in the IETF could respond. Scott Mansfield, the ITU-T liaison manager, has proposed text for a boilerplate response, and the IAB will continue working with him to find a solution.