Skip to main content

Minutes interim-2026-cellar-03: Tue 19:00
minutes-interim-2026-cellar-03-202604281900-00

Meeting Minutes Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission (cellar) WG
Date and time 2026-04-28 19:00
Title Minutes interim-2026-cellar-03: Tue 19:00
State Active
Other versions markdown
Last updated 2026-04-28

minutes-interim-2026-cellar-03-202604281900-00

CELLAR -- Mar 28 1800 UTC

Meetecho session

Agenda / Notes

Please share video when possible. Remember that the session is being
recorded and will appear at YouTube.

Tip: press “Expand all” in the navigation menu

👥 Participants (please add yourself as you join)

  • Spencer Dawkins
  • Jérôme Martinez
  • Dave Rice
  • Steve Lhomme
  • Michael Niedermayer
  • Robert Sparks
  • Charles Eckel

Regrets:

📣 Note Well

https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/
Please be KIND to each other.

👀 Previous meeting minutes

Introducing Charles Eckel, our new Area Director

🗣️ Working Group Documents

See https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/cellar/documents/

draft-ietf-cellar-tags

  • draft-ietf-cellar-tags-24 has Charles's Yes vote, so is formally
    ready for approval.
  • Charles wanted to check with the new ADs, to see if anyone wanted to
    review it before sending it to the RFC Editor.
  • Charles is finishing up discussion with IANA and will bring a
    possible resolution to the mailing list.

draft-ietf-cellar-codec

  • Steve has submitted -18, which Charles is happy with.
  • Charles had a question about a downref in the revised Shepherd
    writeup for -18
    . Spencer clarified what Spencer was saying in
    the writeup. :smile:
  • Charles wants to take a look at IANA considerations before Last Call
  • This should be going for IETF Last Call very soon.

Expired draft-ietf-cellar-chapter-codecs

  • Any update?
  • We do have one set of reference specifications that we might not be
    able to provide for review
  • Can someone persuade the National Library of Japan to share this?
    Possibly the Library of Congress?

draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-v4

  • Any update?
  • We have a new proposal for RGGB/Bayer support in FFMPEG under
    discussion for this specification

  • There is also several proposals from Michael forstoring raw LSB that
    needs to be reviewed

  • Floating point support is available in FFmpeg, but still need to
    update the spec
  • When would the group be reviewing text for this draft? We hope this
    year, but 4Q26 at the earliest

🔥 Hot Topics

Recent Errata for our RFCs

Errata 8658

  • Steve says this errata isn't correct - it's the presence of the
    attribute that describes the recurring aspects, not the value of the
    attribute itself
  • Suggested Status (for our AD) is "Rejected"

Errata 8854

  • Steve says this errata isn't wrong, but objects to the
    suggestion of "unbounded" values in XML or EBML specifications.
  • The right way to say this, is by omitting the maxOccurs attribute,
    and the specification says that's equivalent to "unbounded".
  • Suggested Status (for our AD) is "Rejected"

Errata 8810

  • Martijn says this report is correct.
  • Suggested Status (for our AD) is "Verified"

Starting on an Internet-Draft for Matroska v4 Additions

  • Steve has submitted PR 1094, creating a new draft.
  • The suggested name is "Matroska Media Container v4 Additions".
  • Spencer's question - would we bundle additions into multiple
    documents, possibly published over time?
  • We are deciding whether to checkpoint the additions as of a date, or
    as "update 1" to produce a document for each addition
  • These really are new elements in Matroska
  • Spencer's question - this looks like our answer to the question
    about how we move Matroska forward, over time. Do I have that right?
    Spencer thinks so
  • Spencer's question - does Updates mean the base specification can be
    untouched?
  • If we want to have Update relationships between Matroska and
    Matroska additions, we need to add that to -codec and -tag
  • We can close on that in the next couple of weeks

"Added" and/or "Revision" attributes for EBML

  • Steve has submitted PR 433, to allow implementations to
    distinguish between RFC 9559 elements and new elements in the EBML
    schema.

Any Other Business?

  • None noted

Next meeting dates

| Meeting | Date |
|----------
| interim-2026-cellar-04 | 2026-05-26 |
| interim-2026-cellar-05 | 2026-06-23 |
| interim-2026-cellar-06 | 2026-08-25 |
| interim-2026-cellar-07 | 2026-09-22 |
| interim-2026-cellar-08 | 2026-10-27 |
| interim-2026-cellar-09 | 2026-12-08 |