Minutes interim-2026-cellar-03: Tue 19:00
minutes-interim-2026-cellar-03-202604281900-00
| Meeting Minutes | Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission (cellar) WG | |
|---|---|---|
| Date and time | 2026-04-28 19:00 | |
| Title | Minutes interim-2026-cellar-03: Tue 19:00 | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | markdown | |
| Last updated | 2026-04-28 |
minutes-interim-2026-cellar-03-202604281900-00
CELLAR -- Mar 28 1800 UTC
Agenda / Notes
Please share video when possible. Remember that the session is being
recorded and will appear at YouTube.
Tip: press “Expand all” in the navigation menu
👥 Participants (please add yourself as you join)
- Spencer Dawkins
- Jérôme Martinez
- Dave Rice
- Steve Lhomme
- Michael Niedermayer
- Robert Sparks
- Charles Eckel
Regrets:
📣 Note Well
https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/
Please be KIND to each other.
👀 Previous meeting minutes
- Are any corrections needed to the previous meeting minutes?
- Jerome said "fine for me", so approved.
Introducing Charles Eckel, our new Area Director
🗣️ Working Group Documents
See https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/cellar/documents/
draft-ietf-cellar-tags
- draft-ietf-cellar-tags-24 has Charles's Yes vote, so is formally
ready for approval. - Charles wanted to check with the new ADs, to see if anyone wanted to
review it before sending it to the RFC Editor. - Charles is finishing up discussion with IANA and will bring a
possible resolution to the mailing list.
draft-ietf-cellar-codec
- Steve has submitted -18, which Charles is happy with.
- Charles had a question about a downref in the revised Shepherd
writeup for -18. Spencer clarified what Spencer was saying in
the writeup. :smile: - Charles wants to take a look at IANA considerations before Last Call
- This should be going for IETF Last Call very soon.
Expired draft-ietf-cellar-chapter-codecs
- Any update?
- We do have one set of reference specifications that we might not be
able to provide for review - Can someone persuade the National Library of Japan to share this?
Possibly the Library of Congress?
draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-v4
- Any update?
-
We have a new proposal for RGGB/Bayer support in FFMPEG under
discussion for this specification- https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/22528
- https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/thread/KVWNFO5EFHAVJXUVZWA7Q3GA2YEZE4BA/
-
There is also several proposals from Michael forstoring raw LSB that
needs to be reviewed - Floating point support is available in FFmpeg, but still need to
update the spec - When would the group be reviewing text for this draft? We hope this
year, but 4Q26 at the earliest
🔥 Hot Topics
Recent Errata for our RFCs
Errata 8658
- Steve says this errata isn't correct - it's the presence of the
attribute that describes the recurring aspects, not the value of the
attribute itself - Suggested Status (for our AD) is "Rejected"
Errata 8854
- Steve says this errata isn't wrong, but objects to the
suggestion of "unbounded" values in XML or EBML specifications. - The right way to say this, is by omitting the maxOccurs attribute,
and the specification says that's equivalent to "unbounded". - Suggested Status (for our AD) is "Rejected"
Errata 8810
- Martijn says this report is correct.
- Suggested Status (for our AD) is "Verified"
Starting on an Internet-Draft for Matroska v4 Additions
- Steve has submitted PR 1094, creating a new draft.
- The suggested name is "Matroska Media Container v4 Additions".
- Spencer's question - would we bundle additions into multiple
documents, possibly published over time? - We are deciding whether to checkpoint the additions as of a date, or
as "update 1" to produce a document for each addition - These really are new elements in Matroska
- Spencer's question - this looks like our answer to the question
about how we move Matroska forward, over time. Do I have that right?
Spencer thinks so - Spencer's question - does Updates mean the base specification can be
untouched? - If we want to have Update relationships between Matroska and
Matroska additions, we need to add that to -codec and -tag - We can close on that in the next couple of weeks
"Added" and/or "Revision" attributes for EBML
- Steve has submitted PR 433, to allow implementations to
distinguish between RFC 9559 elements and new elements in the EBML
schema.
Any Other Business?
- None noted
Next meeting dates
| Meeting | Date |
|----------
| interim-2026-cellar-04 | 2026-05-26 |
| interim-2026-cellar-05 | 2026-06-23 |
| interim-2026-cellar-06 | 2026-08-25 |
| interim-2026-cellar-07 | 2026-09-22 |
| interim-2026-cellar-08 | 2026-10-27 |
| interim-2026-cellar-09 | 2026-12-08 |