Last Call Review of draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-01
review-arkko-trip-registry-update-01-secdir-lc-emery-2018-12-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-arkko-trip-registry-update |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 01) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2019-01-01 | |
Requested | 2018-12-04 | |
Authors | Jari Arkko , Ted Hardie | |
I-D last updated | 2019-07-09 (Latest revision 2018-12-04) | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -00
by Carlos Pignataro
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -01 by Robert Sparks Secdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Shawn M Emery Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Carlos Pignataro |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Shawn M Emery |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-arkko-trip-registry-update by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-12-13 |
review-arkko-trip-registry-update-01-secdir-lc-emery-2018-12-13-00
Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This draft updates the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) protocol (RFC 3219) IANA registry requirements to no longer include the contact's postal address. The security considerations section does exist and states that there are no security threats introduced by this draft. I agree. General comments: None. Editorial comments: None. Shawn. --