Last Call Review of draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00
review-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00-genart-lc-dupont-2017-07-03-00
Request | Review of | draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 00) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-07-19 | |
Requested | 2017-06-21 | |
Authors | Carsten Bormann | |
I-D last updated | 2017-07-03 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -00
by Rich Salz
Genart Last Call review of -00 by Francis Dupont Opsdir Last Call review of -00 by Dan Romascanu |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 00 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-07-03 |
review-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00-genart-lc-dupont-2017-07-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20170626 IETF LC End Date: 20170719 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 2: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments (note you can argue you use British (vs American) English, I tried ispell with both dictionaries and none gave other spelling errors other than necessicated below) - 1 page 2: necessicated -> needed or required (or necessitated) - Acknowledg(e)ments page 3: as the section is empty perhaps the simplest is to remove it (or to ask the RFC Editor to remove it)? Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr