Last Call Review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02

Request Review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-01-05
Requested 2015-12-10
Authors Ben Campbell, Alissa Cooper, Barry Leiba
Draft last updated 2016-02-26
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Vijay Gurbani (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Vijay Gurbani
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Jon Mitchell (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay Gurbani 
State Completed
Review review-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02-genart-lc-gurbani-2016-02-26
Reviewed rev. 02 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2016-02-26


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Feb-26-2016
IETF LC End Date: Not known
IESG Telechat date: Not known

This document is ready as a BCP, however, it does have 1 Minor issue
that I detail below.

Major: 0
Minor: 1
Nits: 0

- S1, "Other RAI working groups develop extensions to SIP that do not
 change the core protocol, new applications of SIP, and other
 technologies for interactive communication among humans."

 Are we intentionally limiting interactive communications only to
 "humans"?  I would suspect that this would be limiting, no?  A
 bunch of SIP SUBS/NOTs happen between automaton, or machines.
 Surely we don't want to exclude these in the future.  My suggestion
 would be to simply take out the phrase "among humans".


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{,} / vijay.gurbani at

  | Calendar: