Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08
review-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08-rtgdir-lc-robles-2020-12-28-00

Request Review of draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2020-12-30
Requested 2020-12-02
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Brian E. Carpenter , Stephen Farrell
I-D last updated 2020-12-28
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Ines Robles (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Comments
Given that this non-technical topic should be important to everyone, as it is related to people's eligibility for leadership positions, please review this document from the participant's point of view and take into account the recent participation format.
Assignment Reviewer Ines Robles
State Completed
Review review-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08-rtgdir-lc-robles-2020-12-28
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/sZ5jGkCP_Y4IpN5ka4QXNt5Zu0k
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 10)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2020-12-28
review-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08-rtgdir-lc-robles-2020-12-28-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
‚Äčhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08.txt
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 28th December 2020
IETF LC End Date: ---
Intended Status: Experimental

Summary:

This document defines a process experiment under RFC 3933 that temporarily
updates the criteria for qualifying volunteers to participate in the IETF
Nominating Committee.

The document is clear , I believe the document is ready. I just have some minor
comments/nits below

Major Issues: None
Minor Issues: None

Nits:

1-Abstract:

apply to one, or at most two, Nominating Committee cycles -> should be added
consecutive cycles?

2-Section 1:

It would be nice to expand the first time NomCom --> NomCom (Nominating
Committee)

3-Section 2:

the IESG must consult the 2021-2022 Nominating Committee chair and the
2020-2021 Nominating Committee chair and publish a report --> the IESG must
consult the 2021-2022 Nominating Committee chair and publish a report

4-Section 4:

Has been a Working Group Chair or Secretary within .... -> ... IETF/IRTF
Working Group Chair or Secretary?

nomcom -> NomCom

Thank you very much for this document,

Ines.