Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-secdir-lc-nir-2022-02-16-00

Request Review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-03-07
Requested 2022-02-09
Requested by Lars Eggert
Authors Brian E. Carpenter
I-D last updated 2022-06-30 (Latest revision 2022-04-01)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Bob Halley (diff)
Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Samita Chakrabarti (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
I18ndir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Comments
We're trying to maximize the reviews for documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. Hence the request to review these pretty short documents, even though they may not need a review from a technical perspective.
Assignment Reviewer Yoav Nir
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_LUz3LDO8ZJJnH5Lc8sLcsh2V5Q
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-02-16
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-secdir-lc-nir-2022-02-16-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The document is ready. It's concise and does just what it's supposed to,
nothing more. That's always good for security.

The security considerations section reads, "This document should not affect the
security of the Internet." I'd go even further and state that it in fact does
not affect the security of the Internet. Documents published by the RFC
editor's new model might, although they might affect it for the better as well
as for the worse.