Last Call Review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-secdir-lc-nir-2022-02-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-03-07 | |
Requested | 2022-02-09 | |
Requested by | Lars Eggert | |
Authors | Brian E. Carpenter | |
I-D last updated | 2022-06-30 (Latest revision 2022-04-01) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05
by Yoav Nir
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff) Intdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Bob Halley (diff) Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Samita Chakrabarti (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) I18ndir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) |
|
Comments |
We're trying to maximize the reviews for documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. Hence the request to review these pretty short documents, even though they may not need a review from a technical perspective. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Yoav Nir |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_LUz3LDO8ZJJnH5Lc8sLcsh2V5Q | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-02-16 |
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-secdir-lc-nir-2022-02-16-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document is ready. It's concise and does just what it's supposed to, nothing more. That's always good for security. The security considerations section reads, "This document should not affect the security of the Internet." I'd go even further and state that it in fact does not affect the security of the Internet. Documents published by the RFC editor's new model might, although they might affect it for the better as well as for the worse.