Early Review of draft-davids-forsalereg-09
review-davids-forsalereg-09-dnsdir-early-gannon-2025-06-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-davids-forsalereg-09 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 09 (document currently at 21) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | DNS Directorate (dnsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-07-08 | |
| Requested | 2025-06-03 | |
| Requested by | Eliot Lear | |
| Authors | Marco Davids | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-07-30 (Latest revision 2026-02-05) | |
| Completed reviews |
Dnsdir Early review of -09
by James Gannon
(diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by James Gannon (diff) Intdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Tim Wicinski (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Russ Housley (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Watson Ladd (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Chongfeng Xie (diff) Artart Telechat review of -19 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) |
|
| Comments |
ISE review instructions can be found at https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/reviewer.guide.txt. For DNS Directorate review, all DNS-related comments more most welcome. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | James Gannon |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-davids-forsalereg by DNS Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/XWhIbUMYW3U8Hva4THpAfMrQwvc | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 21) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2025-06-17 |
review-davids-forsalereg-09-dnsdir-early-gannon-2025-06-17-00
Reviewer: James Gannon Review Result: Ready with Issues Document: draft-davids-forsalereg-09 Review Type: DNS Directorate Technical Review Review Date: 17 June 25 Summary: This document defines an operational convention for indicating that a domain name is available for sale by publishing a reserved leaf node using the underscored label "_for-sale". The convention is simple, uses established DNS practices for underscored labels, and is should have minimal/no impact on normal domain operations. Technical Review: From a DNS technical perspective, the use of a reserved underscored label for meta-information is consistent with existing conventions. Placing this label as a leaf node ensures it does not interfere with delegations or services. I have no technical objections to the mechanism as specified; it is clear and should not pose operational issues. I have a concern about the potential proliferation of use of this mechansim however vs using existing options such as TXT records. Process Concern: However, the proposed convention is generic and has clear potential to become widely adopted across registrars and domain owners. This means it may become a de facto standard. Given this, I believe this work would benefit from broader community discussion and review within the DNSOP, rather than progressing solely via the Independent Stream. Doing so would ensure consensus and consistency with other reserved-label practices. Recommendation: Technical: No issues. Process: Recommend that this work be brought to DNSOP for community discussion and potential standardization. James Gannon DNS Directorate Reviewer