Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-davids-forsalereg-09
review-davids-forsalereg-09-dnsdir-early-gannon-2025-06-17-00

Request Review of draft-davids-forsalereg-09
Requested revision 09 (document currently at 21)
Type Early Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2025-07-08
Requested 2025-06-03
Requested by Eliot Lear
Authors Marco Davids
I-D last updated 2026-07-30 (Latest revision 2026-02-05)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -09 by James Gannon (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by James Gannon (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Russ Housley (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Chongfeng Xie (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -19 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Comments
ISE review instructions can be found at https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/reviewer.guide.txt.
For DNS Directorate review, all DNS-related comments more most welcome.
Assignment Reviewer James Gannon
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-davids-forsalereg by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/XWhIbUMYW3U8Hva4THpAfMrQwvc
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 21)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2025-06-17
review-davids-forsalereg-09-dnsdir-early-gannon-2025-06-17-00
Reviewer: James Gannon
Review Result: Ready with Issues
Document: draft-davids-forsalereg-09
Review Type: DNS Directorate Technical Review
Review Date: 17 June 25

Summary:
This document defines an operational convention for indicating that a domain
name is available for sale by publishing a reserved leaf node using the
underscored label "_for-sale". The convention is simple, uses established DNS
practices for underscored labels, and is should have minimal/no impact on
normal domain operations.

Technical Review:
From a DNS technical perspective, the use of a reserved underscored label for
meta-information is consistent with existing conventions. Placing this label as
a leaf node ensures it does not interfere with delegations or services. I have
no technical objections to the mechanism as specified; it is clear and should
not pose operational issues. I have a concern about the potential proliferation
of use of this mechansim however vs using existing options such as TXT records.

Process Concern:
However, the proposed convention is generic and has clear potential to become
widely adopted across registrars and domain owners. This means it may become a
de facto standard. Given this, I believe this work would benefit from broader
community discussion and review within the DNSOP, rather than progressing
solely via the Independent Stream. Doing so would ensure consensus and
consistency with other reserved-label practices.

Recommendation:
Technical: No issues.
Process: Recommend that this work be brought to DNSOP for community discussion
and potential standardization.

James Gannon
DNS Directorate Reviewer