IETF Last Call Review of draft-davids-forsalereg-18
review-davids-forsalereg-18-secdir-lc-ladd-2025-12-15-00

Request Review of draft-davids-forsalereg
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2025-12-29
Requested 2025-12-01
Authors Marco Davids
I-D last updated 2026-07-30 (Latest revision 2026-02-05)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -09 by James Gannon (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by James Gannon (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Russ Housley (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -18 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -18 by Chongfeng Xie (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -19 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Watson Ladd
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-davids-forsalereg by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/S77jMMajVKvtGL8iPJ3lRo9ak0w
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 21)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-12-15
review-davids-forsalereg-18-secdir-lc-ladd-2025-12-15-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready. This draft was very straightforward
to read, and adding a new kind of domain terminal with a text record
does not impact security in any unpredictable ways.