Last Call Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01
review-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2016-12-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-12-26 | |
| Requested | 2016-11-28 | |
| Authors | Julien ÉLIE | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-12-08 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -01
by David Mandelberg
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) Genart Telechat review of -03 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Genart Telechat review of -04 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | David Mandelberg |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2016-12-08 |
review-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2016-12-08-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I think this document is ready with nits. Section 2.4: I think the second to last bullet (about lack of STARTTLS) should be expanded in scope to say "during any previous connection within a (possibly configurable) time frame" instead of "during the previous connection." Otherwise, a human might not see the warning the first time, and the warning would disappear immediately after that. -- David Eric Mandelberg / dseomn http://david.mandelberg.org/