Telechat Review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
review-faltstrom-unicode11-08-genart-telechat-romascanu-2019-03-18-00
Request | Review of | draft-faltstrom-unicode11 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2019-03-12 | |
Requested | 2019-03-05 | |
Authors | Patrik Fältström | |
I-D last updated | 2019-03-18 | |
Completed reviews |
I18ndir Last Call review of -07
by Harald T. Alvestrand
(diff)
I18ndir Last Call review of -08 by Asmus, Inc. Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Samuel Weiler Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dan Romascanu |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-faltstrom-unicode11 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2019-03-18 |
review-faltstrom-unicode11-08-genart-telechat-romascanu-2019-03-18-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2019-03-18 IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail). Major issues: Minor issues: (from my previous review, not addressed) The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me. > IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived property values are calculated correctly. What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or do they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be performed prior to approval of this document? Nits/editorial comments: