Last Call Review of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05
review-farrresnickel-harassment-05-genart-lc-taylor-2015-02-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-farrresnickel-harassment |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-02-13 | |
| Requested | 2015-01-22 | |
| Authors | Pete Resnick , Adrian Farrel | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-12-20 (Latest revision 2015-11-03) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05
by Tom Taylor
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Ron Bonica (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tom Taylor |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-farrresnickel-harassment by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2015-02-02 |
review-farrresnickel-harassment-05-genart-lc-taylor-2015-02-02-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05 Reviewer: Tom Taylor Review Date: 2015/02/02 IETF LC End Date:2015/02/13 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is ready to go with minor editorial issues. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: The Ombudsteam is taken for granted from Section 2 onwards. It would be nice to mention in the Introduction that the IESG mentioned Ombudspersons in its statement of anti-harassment policy [1], but did not define the procedures under which the Ombudsteam would be constituted and under which they would operate. This document remedies that lack. Reference URIs [1] and [2] are identical. Should one be removed? Presumably the Ombudsteam web site will be set up upon approval of this document -- it does not exist at the moment. Section 4.1, first paragraph, fourth line: s/objection/objections/