Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-02

Request Review of draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-02-14
Requested 2017-01-17
Authors Asmus Freytag
I-D last updated 2017-01-24
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Rick Casarez (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 06)
Result Not ready
Completed 2017-01-24
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170121
IETF LC End Date: 20170214
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Not Ready

Major issues: this document is not understable at all without a
previous reading of RFC7940

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 
 - IDN is not a well known abbrev so must be expanded in Abstract
  and in the body (cf for the list of abbrevs

 - title page 1: likely should be changed to include more context

 - ToC page 1 and A page 19: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 1 page 2: please add more context from the beginning
  (or simply stands that to read the document one must know RFC 7940)


Francis.Dupont at

PS: I have not (yet) read RFC 7940 (I review paper I-Ds in public
transportation so without access to the RFC collection  :-).