Last Call Review of draft-gellens-lost-validation-05
review-gellens-lost-validation-05-secdir-lc-emery-2020-03-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-gellens-lost-validation |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-03-31 | |
Requested | 2020-02-25 | |
Authors | Randall Gellens , Brian Rosen | |
I-D last updated | 2020-03-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -05
by Shawn M Emery
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff) Genart Last Call review of -08 by Pete Resnick (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Shawn M Emery |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-gellens-lost-validation by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/DyfJfoS9zR-r8gczBSWlPtiJutc | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-03-04 |
review-gellens-lost-validation-05-secdir-lc-emery-2020-03-06-00
Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This draft specifies an IANA registry for the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol Validation Service Tag under U-NAPTR. The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFC 3958 and 4848. I agree that this change does not introduce any new security considerations. General comments: None. Editorial comments: Abbreviations should be expanded in the title of the draft and when first used (in this case the Abstract). s/...// Shawn. --