Last Call Review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06
review-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06-genart-lc-mishra-2021-01-06-00

Request Review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2021-01-04
Requested 2020-12-07
Authors Fernando Gont, Ivan Arce
Draft last updated 2021-01-06
Completed reviews Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Bernard Aboba
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Gyan Mishra
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Charlie Kaufman
Assignment Reviewer Gyan Mishra 
State Completed
Review review-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06-genart-lc-mishra-2021-01-06
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/sQeXJs6ZU4ga80XkFYFCGKo_u0w
Reviewed rev. 06
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2021-01-06

Review
review-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06-genart-lc-mishra-2021-01-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-??
Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review Date: 2021-01-06
IETF LC End Date: 2021-01-04
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This document updates RFC 3552 Security Considerations for Transient numeric identifiers employed in network protocols.
Currently RFC 3552 does not address transient network identifiers exploitation by pervasive monitoring.  

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
My suggestion is to maybe have examples section similar to RFC 3552 that gives examples of the security implications of the various types of transient numeric identifiers.
An example for IPv6 IID would be using modified EUI64 versus RFC 4941 privacy extension or even RFC 7217 / RFC 8064 stable IID. 

Nits/editorial comments:
None