Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08
review-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08-secdir-lc-roca-2024-05-30-00

Request Review of draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-06-14
Requested 2024-05-17
Authors Joel M. Halpern , Jay Daley
I-D last updated 2024-05-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Susan Hares (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -08 by Julian Reschke (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -08 by Geoff Huston (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -09 by Geoff Huston
Assignment Reviewer Vincent Roca
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/2MveC1g1Fw2ldUv5wj9EoxQVWq4
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-05-30
review-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08-secdir-lc-roca-2024-05-30-00
Hello,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

Summary: Ready

This document has no security implication.

<secdir cap off>
However, as a chairman of an IRTF RG (NWCRG) previously confronted with hostile
behavior through late IPR declarations (i.e., once RFCs have been published)
from longstanding active group participants, I came to the conclusion that a
player can easily block a whole domain by means of FUD strategies and a
portfolio of patents of dubious solidity and manifestly misused. And there's
not much we can do at IETF level, unfortunately. </secdir cap off>

Regards,   Vincent