IETF Last Call Review of draft-hardaker-dns-wgs-at-ietf-06
review-hardaker-dns-wgs-at-ietf-06-genart-lc-bryant-2026-04-29-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-hardaker-dns-wgs-at-ietf-06
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2026-04-29
IETF LC End Date: 2026-05-08
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

As a body of text recording history it is fine. However there are a couple of
IESG policy issue that may be a cause for concern.

Major issues: As a body of text this is fine. However, I remember long
discussions about whether information like this should be recorded as an RFC
causing extra work for the RFC production centre, or whether the eternal
existence of draft was a satisfactory historic reference, or whether a wiki was
a better approach. I certainly remember RTG drafts of this type being declined
RFC status at IESG level on that basis. This is clearly not a GENART issue, but
one that the IETG should be consistent on.

I note that the RFC2119 declaration is not of standard format and believe that
should be changed. However the RFC2119 declaration refers to a human behaviour
and my recollection is that IESG policy (after long discussion) was that this
was not appropriate. If I have misremembered I apologies, but the usage must be
aligned with policy.

Minor issues:None

Nits/editorial comments: None