Last Call Review of draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02
review-hardy-pdf-mime-02-genart-lc-romascanu-2016-07-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-hardy-pdf-mime |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-07-21 | |
| Requested | 2016-06-23 | |
| Authors | Matthew Hardy , Larry M Masinter , Dejan Markovic , Duff Johnson, Martin Bailey | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-03-17 (Latest revision 2017-02-23) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -02
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -02 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -00 by Rick Casarez (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-hardy-pdf-mime by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-07-15 |
review-hardy-pdf-mime-02-genart-lc-romascanu-2016-07-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 07/07/16 IETF LC End Date: 07/21/16 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready. This informational document which obsoletes RFC 3778 provides an overview of the PDF format and updates the media type registration of “application/pdf” by aligning it with RFC 6838. I am no expert in application formats, but the document seems to be well informed and clearly written. A couple of nits generate id-nits warnings (updating RFC 3778 is not mentioned in the Abstract, one unused reference) that can be easily fixed during the RFC Editor processing. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: