Last Call Review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02
review-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02-secdir-lc-perlman-2021-07-29-00
Request | Review of | draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-08-13 | |
Requested | 2021-07-09 | |
Authors | Russ Housley , Carl Wallace | |
I-D last updated | 2021-07-29 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by Linda Dunbar
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Radia Perlman (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Radia Perlman |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/FSc3XkGb_R8hGakP057SiIZwZ60 | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-07-28 |
review-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02-secdir-lc-perlman-2021-07-29-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready This document is intended to be Informational. This document gives alternative ASN.1 specifications for RFC5276 (Evidence Record Syntax). These alternative specifications are intended to produce the same bits-on-the wire as the originals but follow newer ASN.1 specifications (2002 vs. 1988); follow the conventions established in RFC5911, RFC5912, and RFC6268; and are freestanding rather than referencing specifications from non-RFCs. I’m not qualified to judge whether the translation was done correctly, but the authors are. Radia