Last Call Review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
review-housley-rfc2050bis-01-genart-lc-dupont-2013-04-22-00
| Request | Review of | draft-housley-rfc2050bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-05-14 | |
| Requested | 2013-04-17 | |
| Authors | Russ Housley , John Curran , Geoff Huston , David R. Conrad | |
| Draft last updated | 2013-04-22 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by
Francis Dupont
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by David Waltermire (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-housley-rfc2050bis-01-genart-lc-dupont-2013-04-22
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-04-22 |
review-housley-rfc2050bis-01-genart-lc-dupont-2013-04-22-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20130420 IETF LC End Date: 20130514 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 2 and 9 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 3 page 3: (more for the RFC Editor) the word "IANA" should be the first of the page 4, not the last of page 3. - 7 page 6: IMHO it is the right place to add a reference to the RPKI (i.e., how the security considerations are implemented) - 9 page 6: I give to SM the opportunity to get his full name in the document... Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr