Last Call Review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
review-housley-rfc2050bis-01-genart-lc-dupont-2013-04-22-00

Request Review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-05-14
Requested 2013-04-17
Draft last updated 2013-04-22
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by David Waltermire (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-housley-rfc2050bis-01-genart-lc-dupont-2013-04-22
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 02)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-04-22

Review
review-housley-rfc2050bis-01-genart-lc-dupont-2013-04-22

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20130420
IETF LC End Date: 20130514
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 2 and 9 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 3 page 3: (more for the RFC Editor) the word "IANA" should be the first
  of the page 4, not the last of page 3.

 - 7 page 6: IMHO it is the right place to add a reference to the RPKI
  (i.e., how the security considerations are implemented)

 - 9 page 6: I give to SM the opportunity to get his full name in the document...

Regards

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr