Last Call Review of draft-ieee-urn-03
review-ieee-urn-03-opsdir-lc-hares-2016-12-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-ieee-urn |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-11-14 | |
Requested | 2016-10-22 | |
Authors | Angela Thomas | |
I-D last updated | 2016-12-12 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -03
by Pete Resnick
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Susan Hares |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Susan Hares |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ieee-urn by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2016-12-12 |
review-ieee-urn-03-opsdir-lc-hares-2016-12-12-00
Angela: I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Status of the document: ready with nit (minor editorial change) Minor editorial nit: Page 3 The abbreviation RDS is not used or defined in this document prior to its usage in this sentence: Old/The name space is not listed with an RDS; this is not relevant./ If you mean RDS to be RFC3406 abbreviation for RDS, then please use this sentence. New/The name space is not listed with an RDS (Resolution Discovery System); this is not relevant. / Sue Hares