Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12
review-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12-opsdir-lc-morton-2019-12-31-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 23) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-01-09 | |
Requested | 2019-12-19 | |
Authors | Pascal Thubert , Behcet Sarikaya , Mohit Sethi , Rene Struik | |
I-D last updated | 2019-12-31 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -12
by Adam W. Montville
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Al Morton (diff) Genart Last Call review of -12 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Al Morton |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12-opsdir-lc-morton-2019-12-31
|
|
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/vwVuS4pB8oH6FLi47YpqZRes7s8 | |
Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 23) | |
Result | Has Nits | |
Completed | 2019-12-31 |
review-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12-opsdir-lc-morton-2019-12-31-00
This is the OPS-DIR review of -12 1) "This specification introduces a new token called a cryptographic identifier (Crypto-ID) that is used to prove indirectly the ownership of an address that is being registered by means of [RFC8505]." during Neighbor Discovery in "...a 6LoWPAN Low Power Lossy Network (LLN), typically a stub network connected to a larger IP network via a Border Router called a 6LBR per [RFC6775]." 2) This seems like a worthwhile update to RFC8505. The section describing the Update aspect is helpful, but ... Nit: there should also a sentence in the Abstract indicating the Update status. The scope of operation is very limited, hence no operational issues detected. 3) The SEC-DIR review will likely be more interesting: this reviewer's experience doesn't foster review of LLN in any depth. 4) The Doc Shepherd's form indicates that the last 4 versions benefited from review by knowledgeable persons in the Security Area.