Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-01-30
Requested 2020-01-16
Authors Pascal Thubert
Draft last updated 2020-02-06
Completed reviews Iotdir Last Call review of -07 by Erik Nordmark (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Tirumaleswar Reddy.K (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -11 by Colin Perkins (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tirumaleswar Reddy.K
State Completed
Review review-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-08-secdir-lc-reddyk-2020-02-06
Posted at
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 21)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2020-02-03
Reviewer: Tirumaleswar Reddy
Review result: Ready with nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. 
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

Summary: Ready with nits

[1] It is not clear to me how the Security sections of I-D.ietf-core-cocoa
apply to this specification ? [2] The security considerations section discusses
I-D.ietf-lwig-6lowpan-virtual-reassembly but that document does not discuss any
security considerations yet. [3] It is not clear how the DoS attack of bogus
first fragments is handled and other attacks discussed in are
tackled ? [4] How does the document align with the recommendations given in ?