Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-18

Request Review of draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2024-04-30
Requested 2024-04-16
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Pascal Thubert
I-D last updated 2024-04-29
Completed reviews Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Dirk Von Hugo (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -16 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -16 by Kyle Rose (diff)
This document is about multicast (hence intdir) and 6lo (hence iotdir). So, please have your directorate review this I-D on those directorate-specific points of view. Thanks.
Assignment Reviewer Dirk Von Hugo
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 19)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-04-29
Dear authors, intarea community,
as assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration
my comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as READY
WITH NITS. I am no RPL expert but find the draft clearly written and AFAICT
technically complete. Nits detected mainly affect grammar (a RPL => an RPL
etc.), missing explanation of acronyms, to re-order acronym list, other typos
(in my gut feeling as non-native speaker), missing ',' etc. ... I will post the
diff-tool created .htm document in Pascals github (in case I succeed). Thanks
and best regards Dirk