Early Review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-15
review-ietf-6man-default-iids-15-intdir-early-korhonen-2016-11-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-default-iids |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-10-20 | |
| Requested | 2016-10-06 | |
| Authors | Fernando Gont , Alissa Cooper , Dave Thaler , Will (Shucheng) LIU | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-11-30 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -16
by Charlie Kaufman
Genart Last Call review of -16 by Roni Even Intdir Early review of -15 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Sarah Banks |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-6man-default-iids by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-11-30 |
review-ietf-6man-default-iids-15-intdir-early-korhonen-2016-11-30-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html. Document: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 10/12/2016 IETF LC End Date: -- IESG Telechat date: -- Summary: Ready for publication. Major issues: None Minor issues: o The I-D updates RFC4291. Now that there is RFC4291bis work ongoing in 6man how that should be handled? I would assume this document should actually reference to 4291bis instead of 4291? Other comments: This document was good read. Nothing to complain. I did review older version -15. What I checked -16 did not change anything that would affect this review. The IDnits complains quite a bit. However, those are bogus errors that IDnits finds.