Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-eh-limits-19
review-ietf-6man-eh-limits-19-iotdir-telechat-korhonen-2025-04-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-eh-limits
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2025-04-10
Requested 2025-03-06
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Tom Herbert
I-D last updated 2025-04-17 (Latest revision 2025-02-27)
Completed reviews Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -16 by John R. Levine (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Jon Geater (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Jon Geater (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -18 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -19 by Jouni Korhonen
Intdir Telechat review of -19 by Jean-Michel Combes
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-eh-limits by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/pz-5ZOD-QhPNU85sM0JFTrZQhvg
Reviewed revision 19
Result Ready
Completed 2025-04-09
review-ietf-6man-eh-limits-19-iotdir-telechat-korhonen-2025-04-09-00
I am the assigned IoT Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Directorate aims
to review IETF documents related with IoT (Internet of Things). Please treat
these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information,
please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/iotdir/about/

Summary:
I found the document easy to digest and in addition to establishing basis for
IPv6 extension header related limitations it also serves as a good summary of
other relevant extension header work. After reading I was wondering why there
is no recommendation of routing header related limits other than bunding it
with e.g., the "limit on the maximum length of the IPv6 header chain up to an
including the Routing Header"?