Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-12
review-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-12-opsdir-lc-chown-2015-03-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-03-03
Requested 2015-01-31
Authors Rajiv Asati , Hemant Singh , Wes Beebee , Carlos Pignataro , Eli Dart , Wesley George
Draft last updated 2015-03-11
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tim Chown
State Completed
Review review-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-12-opsdir-lc-chown-2015-03-11
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-03-11
review-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-12-opsdir-lc-chown-2015-03-11-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's 

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These 

comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the 

IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews 

during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments 

just like any other last call comments. 

I believe this draft is on the IESG telechat agenda for tomorrow. There have been 

a minor update from -13 to -14 in the last couple of days to clarify the RFCs that 

the draft updates, which now seems resolved between the advice from the two 

ADs in question.

My view is that the document is Ready.

Very minor nits:

The last sentence of section 1 is a little clumsy, and perhaps unnecessary:

"

The Cha

nges to RFC 4861 section includes an update 

to RFC 4861."

The first paragraph in the Problem Statement could be broken into two or three.

Tim