Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01
review-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01-secdir-lc-yu-2016-09-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-08-30 | |
| Requested | 2016-08-11 | |
| Authors | Bill Fenner (ˢˣˠ) | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-09-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Jouni Korhonen
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Taylor Yu (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Dan Romascanu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Taylor Yu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-09-01 |
review-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01-secdir-lc-yu-2016-09-01-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: ready The security considerations section of this document seems reasonable. Republishing obsolete MIBs that are explicitly marked as obsolete in their bodies sounds like a good idea.