Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6man-maxra-03
review-ietf-6man-maxra-03-secdir-lc-salz-2017-09-14-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-maxra |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-09-15 | |
| Requested | 2017-09-01 | |
| Authors | Suresh Krishnan , Jouni Korhonen , Samita Chakrabarti , Erik Nordmark , Andrew Yourtchenko | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-09-14 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -03
by
Mahesh Jethanandani
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Rich Salz (diff) Genart Last Call review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Rich Salz |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-6man-maxra-03-secdir-lc-salz-2017-09-14
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 04) | |
| Result | Has Nits | |
| Completed | 2017-09-14 |
review-ietf-6man-maxra-03-secdir-lc-salz-2017-09-14-00
I reviewed this document for SECDIR. It's ready. I have one minor editorial suggestion. The introduction has this text: There are already link technology specific clarifications how to tune protocol constants for certain system with the expectation to reduce excess Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP) traffic. 3GPP cellular links are one existing example [RFC6459][RFC7066]. I would suggest rewording it like this: Clarifications for how to tune protocol constants to reduce Neighbord Discover Protocol (NDP) traffic already exist; for example [RFC6459] and ]RFC7066] for 3GPP.