Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02
review-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02-secdir-telechat-leiba-2018-02-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-03-06
Requested 2018-02-05
Authors Ole Trøan
I-D last updated 2018-02-09
Completed reviews Intdir Early review of -02 by Carlos J. Bernardos (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -02 by Al Morton (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -02 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Barry Leiba
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-02-09
review-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02-secdir-telechat-leiba-2018-02-09-00
This document fills a gap created by RFC 6275 by creating a necessary IANA
registry.  The document is well written and ready to go, with no security
implications that I can imagine.

I read Al Morton's OpsDir review.  Commenting on that:
- I think the document can go ahead with or without the changes that Al
suggests, but... - I agree that it'd be useful to show the reserved bits in the
registry table, except that I'd give the reference for it as RFC 4861, not
6275. - The text in Section 4 already does say what the registration policy is,
and I don't think "or IESG Approval" should be added. - I don't think it's
necessary to add "updates 6275", though I wouldn't object to it. - I agree that
adding section references would be nice.  I found the fields easily by
searching on their names, but I'm a general fan of using section references to
make things clearer to readers.

--
Barry