Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09
review-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2024-09-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-09-30 | |
Requested | 2024-09-16 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Lorenzo Colitti , Jen Linkova , Xiao Ma , David Lamparter | |
I-D last updated | 2024-09-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -09
by Benjamin M. Schwartz
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Susan Hares (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -10 by Erik Nordmark Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Dirk Von Hugo (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dirk Von Hugo |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/adGCqjFxpf6H_JcXkXHLKWzqMhA | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2024-09-27 |
review-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2024-09-27-00
Dear all, I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. I think the draft is of great value for better operational efficiency and very well written. Thanks to the authors! In addition to points raised within SEC and GEN reviews - I could only find some nits or IMHO useful clarifications as listed below: p.1: IA_NA => Identity Association for Non-temporary Addresses (IA_NA) p.2: Prefix Delegation => Prefix Delegation (PD) VMs => Virtual Machines p.3: 15 devices connect => 15 devices have been connected p.4: ULA => ULA (Unique Local Address) indicates that that the network => indicates that the network as follows: => as follows (see Figure 1): p.7: this problem this is => this problem is p.8: rule 5 => Rule 5 of [RFC6724] RFC-Mandated Behavior => RFC-Mandated Behaviour p.9 (2x): doesn't => does not Thanks and Best regards Dirk