Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09
review-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2024-09-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2024-09-30
Requested 2024-09-16
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Lorenzo Colitti , Jen Linkova , Xiao Ma , David Lamparter
I-D last updated 2024-09-27
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Benjamin M. Schwartz (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Susan Hares (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -10 by Erik Nordmark
Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Dirk Von Hugo (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dirk Von Hugo
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/adGCqjFxpf6H_JcXkXHLKWzqMhA
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-09-27
review-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2024-09-27-00
Dear all,
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

I think the draft is of great value for better operational efficiency and very
well written. Thanks to the authors! In addition to points raised within SEC
and GEN reviews - I could only find some nits or IMHO useful clarifications as
listed below:

p.1:
IA_NA => Identity Association for Non-temporary Addresses (IA_NA)
p.2:
Prefix Delegation => Prefix Delegation (PD)
VMs => Virtual Machines
p.3:
15 devices connect => 15 devices have been connected
p.4:
ULA => ULA (Unique Local Address)
indicates that that the network => indicates that the network
as follows: => as follows (see Figure 1):
p.7:
this problem this is => this problem is
p.8:
rule 5 => Rule 5 of [RFC6724]
RFC-Mandated Behavior => RFC-Mandated Behaviour
p.9 (2x):
doesn't => does not

Thanks and
Best regards
Dirk