Early Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08-intdir-early-halley-2017-01-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Early Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2017-01-19
Requested 2017-01-04
Requested by Suresh Krishnan
Authors Steve Deering, Bob Hinden
Draft last updated 2017-01-06
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Papadimitriou Dimitri (diff)
Intdir Early review of -08 by Bob Halley (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Peter Yee (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -09 by Martin Stiemerling (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Bob Halley
State Completed
Review review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08-intdir-early-halley-2017-01-06
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 13)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-01-06

Review
review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08-intdir-early-halley-2017-01-06

As usual, I get just which email to send to wrong...  This is what I sent to the authors, the ADs, and the WG.

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html.

I reviewed the draft, including a detailed comparison with RFC 2460.  I found no issues with the draft, and I think it’s an excellent update to the original.