Early Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08-intdir-early-halley-2017-01-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-01-19 | |
| Requested | 2017-01-04 | |
| Requested by | Suresh Krishnan | |
| Authors | Dr. Steve E. Deering , Bob Hinden | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-01-06 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08
by Papadimitriou Dimitri
(diff)
Intdir Early review of -08 by Bob Halley (diff) Genart Last Call review of -08 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -09 by Martin Stiemerling (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Opsdir Early review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Bob Halley |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-01-06 |
review-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08-intdir-early-halley-2017-01-06-00
As usual, I get just which email to send to wrong... This is what I sent to the authors, the ADs, and the WG. I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html. I reviewed the draft, including a detailed comparison with RFC 2460. I found no issues with the draft, and I think it’s an excellent update to the original.